PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AADR vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AADR vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AADR achieves a -5.16% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 8.20% return. Over the past 10 years, AADR has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 9.17%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.58% annualized return.


AADR

1D
-1.63%
1M
-4.90%
YTD
-5.16%
6M
-6.14%
1Y
8.05%
3Y*
19.73%
5Y*
5.58%
10Y*
9.17%

IVV

1D
-1.42%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
8.20%
6M
7.25%
1Y
23.72%
3Y*
20.79%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AADR vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AADR
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF
-5.16%25.63%24.58%18.67%-22.93%6.48%13.13%35.35%-31.55%47.76%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
8.20%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%

Correlation

The correlation between AADR and IVV is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2010

0.61

The correlation between AADR and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

AADR vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AADR
IVV

Healthcare

17.6%
8.3%

Basic Materials

16.7%
1.7%

Financial Services

15.1%
11.1%

Industrials

12.4%
7.8%

Technology

9.9%
39.0%

Communication Services

9.3%
10.6%

Energy

8.9%
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
9.9%

Utilities

2.7%
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
4.5%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Healthcare

AADR
17.6%
IVV
8.3%

Basic Materials

AADR
16.7%
IVV
1.7%

Financial Services

AADR
15.1%
IVV
11.1%

Industrials

AADR
12.4%
IVV
7.8%

Technology

AADR
9.9%
IVV
39.0%

Communication Services

AADR
9.3%
IVV
10.6%

Energy

AADR
8.9%
IVV
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

AADR
5.2%
IVV
9.9%

Utilities

AADR
2.7%
IVV
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

AADR
2.3%
IVV
4.5%

Real Estate

AADR

-

IVV
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AADR vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AADR
AADR Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
AADR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AADR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
AADR Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
AADR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
AADR Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AADR vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AADRIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.35

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

2.68

-2.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.07

11.98

-10.91

AADR vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AADR Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AADR and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AADR vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AADR drawdown since its inception was -45.01%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AADR and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AADRIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.01%

-55.25%

+10.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.30%

-8.89%

-10.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.61%

-18.75%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.80%

-24.53%

-10.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.01%

-33.90%

-11.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.74%

-3.14%

-12.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.41%

-10.76%

+1.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.56%

1.99%

+5.57%

Volatility

AADR vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) has a higher volatility of 5.79% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 4.88%. This indicates that AADR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AADRIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.79%

4.88%

+0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.21%

9.85%

+8.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.76%

12.48%

+9.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.75%

16.98%

+4.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.14%

18.07%

+4.07%

AADR vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AADR has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

AADR vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

AADR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than IVV's 1.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AADR
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF
0.31%0.49%1.33%0.74%3.65%0.92%0.11%0.58%0.75%0.74%0.58%0.81%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.11%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


AADR and IVV have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AADR has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to IVV (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AADR dropped -45.01% vs IVV's -55.25%.

On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.58% vs 9.17% for AADR. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.58% return vs 9.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for AADR.

IVV has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.31% for AADR.

AADR is categorized as Global Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for AADR and 0.03% for IVV.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AADR and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer