PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AADAX vs. QYLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AADAX and QYLD is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

AADAX vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Select Risk: Growth Investor Fund (AADAX) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
8.29%
19.68%
AADAX
QYLD

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AADAX:

0.99

QYLD:

1.76

Sortino Ratio

AADAX:

1.37

QYLD:

2.42

Omega Ratio

AADAX:

1.18

QYLD:

1.41

Calmar Ratio

AADAX:

0.54

QYLD:

2.43

Martin Ratio

AADAX:

4.36

QYLD:

12.90

Ulcer Index

AADAX:

2.31%

QYLD:

1.46%

Daily Std Dev

AADAX:

10.24%

QYLD:

10.72%

Max Drawdown

AADAX:

-60.57%

QYLD:

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

AADAX:

-9.84%

QYLD:

-0.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AADAX achieves a 3.06% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 2.79% return. Over the past 10 years, AADAX has underperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 2.51%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.90% annualized return.


AADAX

YTD

3.06%

1M

2.31%

6M

8.28%

1Y

10.93%

5Y*

1.00%

10Y*

2.51%

QYLD

YTD

2.79%

1M

1.84%

6M

19.69%

1Y

18.25%

5Y*

7.39%

10Y*

8.90%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AADAX vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

AADAX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
Expense ratio chart for QYLD: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%
Expense ratio chart for AADAX: current value at 0.43% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.43%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AADAX vs. QYLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AADAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AADAX is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AADAX is 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AADAX is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AADAX is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AADAX is 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AADAX is 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QYLD is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QYLD is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QYLD is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QYLD is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QYLD is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QYLD is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AADAX vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Select Risk: Growth Investor Fund (AADAX) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AADAX, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.991.76
The chart of Sortino ratio for AADAX, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.372.42
The chart of Omega ratio for AADAX, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.181.41
The chart of Calmar ratio for AADAX, currently valued at 0.54, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.542.43
The chart of Martin ratio for AADAX, currently valued at 4.36, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.004.3612.90
AADAX
QYLD

The current AADAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AADAX and QYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.99
1.76
AADAX
QYLD

Dividends

AADAX vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

AADAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, less than QYLD's 12.33% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AADAX
Invesco Select Risk: Growth Investor Fund
2.46%2.54%0.65%1.48%1.50%1.73%1.36%1.38%1.84%1.13%1.59%1.78%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
12.33%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%10.74%

Drawdowns

AADAX vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AADAX drawdown since its inception was -60.57%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AADAX and QYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-9.84%
-0.16%
AADAX
QYLD

Volatility

AADAX vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Select Risk: Growth Investor Fund (AADAX) is 2.95%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a volatility of 3.34%. This indicates that AADAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.95%
3.34%
AADAX
QYLD
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab