PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AADAX vs. QYLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


AADAXQYLD
YTD Return10.10%15.56%
1Y Return23.78%21.70%
3Y Return (Ann)0.70%5.02%
5Y Return (Ann)6.28%7.66%
10Y Return (Ann)5.77%8.32%
Sharpe Ratio2.292.04
Sortino Ratio3.262.77
Omega Ratio1.421.48
Calmar Ratio1.122.21
Martin Ratio13.9814.50
Ulcer Index1.63%1.43%
Daily Std Dev9.96%10.21%
Max Drawdown-55.88%-24.89%
Current Drawdown-0.69%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between AADAX and QYLD is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

AADAX vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, AADAX achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 15.56% return. Over the past 10 years, AADAX has underperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 5.77%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.32% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
8.44%
11.79%
AADAX
QYLD

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AADAX vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

AADAX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
Expense ratio chart for QYLD: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%
Expense ratio chart for AADAX: current value at 0.43% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.43%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AADAX vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Select Risk: Growth Investor Fund (AADAX) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AADAX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AADAX, currently valued at 2.29, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.29
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AADAX, currently valued at 3.26, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.26
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AADAX, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.42
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AADAX, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.001.12
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AADAX, currently valued at 13.98, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0013.98
QYLD
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for QYLD, currently valued at 2.13, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.13
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for QYLD, currently valued at 2.90, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.90
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for QYLD, currently valued at 1.51, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.51
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for QYLD, currently valued at 2.31, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.002.31
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for QYLD, currently valued at 15.31, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0015.31

AADAX vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AADAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AADAX and QYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.00MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
2.29
2.13
AADAX
QYLD

Dividends

AADAX vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

AADAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than QYLD's 11.29% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
AADAX
Invesco Select Risk: Growth Investor Fund
1.89%2.08%5.87%6.35%11.65%9.73%2.44%1.83%1.13%1.59%1.78%1.53%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.29%11.78%13.26%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%10.74%0.00%

Drawdowns

AADAX vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AADAX drawdown since its inception was -55.88%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AADAX and QYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
-0.69%
0
AADAX
QYLD

Volatility

AADAX vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Select Risk: Growth Investor Fund (AADAX) has a higher volatility of 2.07% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.42%. This indicates that AADAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
2.07%
1.42%
AADAX
QYLD