AADAX vs. QYLD

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

AADAX (Invesco Select Risk: Growth Investor Fund) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both funds - AADAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Invesco, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Over the past 10 years, AADAX returned 8.27%/yr vs 9.61%/yr for QYLD. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AADAX charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.

Performance

AADAX vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Select Risk: Growth Investor Fund (AADAX) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AADAX achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 5.92% return. Over the past 10 years, AADAX has underperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 8.27%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 9.61% annualized return.

AADAX

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 2.48%
• YTD: 11.50%
• 6M: 11.21%
• 1Y: 23.31%
• 3Y*: 14.86%
• 5Y*: 6.29%
• 10Y*: 8.27%

QYLD

• 1D: -1.82%
• 1M: -0.67%
• YTD: 5.92%
• 6M: 7.78%
• 1Y: 21.82%
• 3Y*: 13.07%
• 5Y*: 8.04%
• 10Y*: 9.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AADAX vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AADAX Invesco Select Risk: Growth Investor Fund	11.50%	15.52%	9.61%	13.38%	-18.74%	13.66%	11.79%	20.63%	-8.29%	15.76%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	5.92%	9.28%	19.35%	22.77%	-19.08%	10.41%	8.72%	22.69%	-3.07%	18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between AADAX and QYLD is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2013	0.72

The correlation between AADAX and QYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AADAX vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AADAX

AADAX Risk / Return Rank: 60
AADAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
AADAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
AADAX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
AADAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
AADAX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 85
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 89
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AADAX vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Select Risk: Growth Investor Fund (AADAX) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AADAX	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	2.50	-0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.04	3.44	-0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.56	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.97	4.41	-1.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.97	25.62	-12.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AADAX vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AADAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AADAX and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AADAX	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.16	2.50	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	0.55	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	0.62	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.58	-0.15

Drawdowns

AADAX vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AADAX drawdown since its inception was -55.79%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AADAX and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	AADAX	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.79%	-24.75%	-31.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.82%	-4.97%	-2.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.66%	-19.06%	+5.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.59%	-24.61%	-1.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.26%	-24.75%	-6.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.16%	-1.87%	+1.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.53%	-3.84%	-4.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.78%	0.85%	+0.93%

Volatility

AADAX vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Select Risk: Growth Investor Fund (AADAX) has a higher volatility of 3.08% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 2.64%. This indicates that AADAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AADAX	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.08%	2.64%	+0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.51%	7.37%	+1.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.75%	8.78%	+1.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.81%	14.71%	-1.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.63%	15.50%	-1.87%

AADAX vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

AADAX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

AADAX vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

AADAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, less than QYLD's 11.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AADAX Invesco Select Risk: Growth Investor Fund	3.57%	3.98%	4.66%	2.08%	5.87%	6.35%	11.65%	9.73%	2.44%	1.83%	1.13%	1.59%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.67%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AADAX and QYLD in my portfolio?

AADAX and QYLD have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AADAX or QYLD?

AADAX has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to QYLD (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AADAX dropped -55.79% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.