PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AACFX vs. BRK-A
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AACFX and BRK-A is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

AACFX vs. BRK-A - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Greater China Fund (AACFX) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc (BRK-A). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%700.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
89.17%
673.63%
AACFX
BRK-A

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AACFX:

0.17

BRK-A:

1.44

Sortino Ratio

AACFX:

0.40

BRK-A:

2.09

Omega Ratio

AACFX:

1.05

BRK-A:

1.26

Calmar Ratio

AACFX:

0.07

BRK-A:

2.84

Martin Ratio

AACFX:

0.39

BRK-A:

7.19

Ulcer Index

AACFX:

10.23%

BRK-A:

3.02%

Daily Std Dev

AACFX:

23.62%

BRK-A:

15.02%

Max Drawdown

AACFX:

-72.17%

BRK-A:

-51.47%

Current Drawdown

AACFX:

-51.63%

BRK-A:

-7.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AACFX achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly lower than BRK-A's 23.61% return. Over the past 10 years, AACFX has underperformed BRK-A with an annualized return of -0.55%, while BRK-A has yielded a comparatively higher 11.42% annualized return.


AACFX

YTD

1.69%

1M

-2.38%

6M

-4.26%

1Y

3.25%

5Y*

-6.16%

10Y*

-0.55%

BRK-A

YTD

23.61%

1M

-5.26%

6M

9.06%

1Y

20.93%

5Y*

14.61%

10Y*

11.42%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AACFX vs. BRK-A - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Greater China Fund (AACFX) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc (BRK-A). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AACFX, currently valued at 0.17, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.171.44
The chart of Sortino ratio for AACFX, currently valued at 0.40, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.000.402.09
The chart of Omega ratio for AACFX, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.051.26
The chart of Calmar ratio for AACFX, currently valued at 0.07, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.072.84
The chart of Martin ratio for AACFX, currently valued at 0.39, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.000.397.19
AACFX
BRK-A

The current AACFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the BRK-A Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AACFX and BRK-A, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.17
1.44
AACFX
BRK-A

Dividends

AACFX vs. BRK-A - Dividend Comparison

Neither AACFX nor BRK-A has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
AACFX
Invesco Greater China Fund
0.00%1.94%1.62%0.06%0.00%1.04%1.04%0.54%0.73%1.07%0.45%1.01%
BRK-A
Berkshire Hathaway Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AACFX vs. BRK-A - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AACFX drawdown since its inception was -72.17%, which is greater than BRK-A's maximum drawdown of -51.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AACFX and BRK-A. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-51.63%
-7.36%
AACFX
BRK-A

Volatility

AACFX vs. BRK-A - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Greater China Fund (AACFX) has a higher volatility of 7.83% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc (BRK-A) at 3.42%. This indicates that AACFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-A based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
7.83%
3.42%
AACFX
BRK-A
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab