PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AACFX vs. BCANX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AACFX and BCANX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

AACFX vs. BCANX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Greater China Fund (AACFX) and Baillie Gifford China A Shares Fund (BCANX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-2.20%
22.74%
AACFX
BCANX

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


AACFX

YTD

-1.65%

1M

-2.00%

6M

-2.20%

1Y

9.43%

5Y*

-7.02%

10Y*

-1.18%

BCANX

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AACFX vs. BCANX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AACFX has a 1.55% expense ratio, which is higher than BCANX's 0.87% expense ratio.


AACFX
Invesco Greater China Fund
Expense ratio chart for AACFX: current value at 1.55% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.55%
Expense ratio chart for BCANX: current value at 0.87% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.87%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AACFX vs. BCANX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AACFX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AACFX is 1717
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AACFX is 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AACFX is 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AACFX is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AACFX is 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AACFX is 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

BCANX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BCANX is 1515
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BCANX is 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BCANX is 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BCANX is 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BCANX is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BCANX is 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AACFX vs. BCANX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Greater China Fund (AACFX) and Baillie Gifford China A Shares Fund (BCANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AACFX, currently valued at 0.46, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.460.55
The chart of Sortino ratio for AACFX, currently valued at 0.80, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.000.801.04
The chart of Omega ratio for AACFX, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.111.15
The chart of Calmar ratio for AACFX, currently valued at 0.19, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.190.21
The chart of Martin ratio for AACFX, currently valued at 0.93, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.000.931.31
AACFX
BCANX


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-2.00-1.50-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.46
0.55
AACFX
BCANX

Dividends

AACFX vs. BCANX - Dividend Comparison

AACFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, while BCANX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AACFX
Invesco Greater China Fund
1.12%1.10%1.94%1.62%0.06%0.00%1.04%1.04%0.54%0.73%1.07%0.45%
BCANX
Baillie Gifford China A Shares Fund
0.44%0.44%0.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AACFX vs. BCANX - Drawdown Comparison


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-51.68%
-61.08%
AACFX
BCANX

Volatility

AACFX vs. BCANX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Greater China Fund (AACFX) has a higher volatility of 4.48% compared to Baillie Gifford China A Shares Fund (BCANX) at 0.00%. This indicates that AACFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCANX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
4.48%
0
AACFX
BCANX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab