AAAU vs. AAA

In the year-to-date period, AAAU achieves a 26.30% return, which is significantly higher than AAA's 1.28% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

AAAU has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than AAA's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) and AAF First Priority CLO Bond ETF (AAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current AAAU Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the AAA Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAAU and AAA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

AAAU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.90%.

The maximum AAAU drawdown since its inception was -21.63%, which is greater than AAA's maximum drawdown of -2.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAU and AAA.

Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) has a higher volatility of 7.83% compared to AAF First Priority CLO Bond ETF (AAA) at 0.79%. This indicates that AAAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.