PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
A vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

A vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Agilent Technologies, Inc. (A) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, A achieves a 2.30% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 9.41% return. Over the past 10 years, A has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 12.24%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.26% annualized return.


A

1D
-0.25%
1M
5.88%
6M
3.81%
YTD
2.30%
1Y
22.89%
3Y*
4.95%
5Y*
-1.32%
10Y*
12.24%
ALL TIME*
6.06%

^GSPC

1D
0.70%
1M
0.09%
6M
7.94%
YTD
9.41%
1Y
20.07%
3Y*
17.84%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*
13.26%
ALL TIME*
8.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$37.98T$37.61T$41.48T
$295.78M$297.36M$311.22M

A vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
A
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
2.30%1.92%-2.70%-6.42%-5.52%35.51%39.79%27.54%1.67%48.32%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
9.41%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between A and ^GSPC is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 1999

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between A and ^GSPC has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

A vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

A
A Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
A Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
A Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
A Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
A Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
A Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

A vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agilent Technologies, Inc. (A) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


A^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.25

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

2.00

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.34

8.49

-7.15

A vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current A Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of A and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

A vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum A drawdown since its inception was -93.18%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for A and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


A^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.18%

-56.78%

-36.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.75%

-9.10%

-20.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.32%

-18.90%

-16.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.19%

-25.43%

-17.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.19%

-33.92%

-9.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.03%

-1.58%

-18.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.08%

-10.70%

-46.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.10%

2.14%

+13.96%

Volatility

A vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Agilent Technologies, Inc. (A) has a higher volatility of 8.22% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 3.51%. This indicates that A's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


A^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.22%

3.51%

+4.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.52%

10.11%

+15.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.92%

12.87%

+20.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.28%

17.01%

+13.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.21%

18.07%

+10.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


A and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

A has higher volatility (8.22%) compared to ^GSPC (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, A dropped -93.18% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for A and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer