9909.HK vs. 1398.HK
Compare and contrast key facts about Powerlong Commercial Mgmt Holdings (9909.HK) and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (1398.HK).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: 9909.HK or 1398.HK.
Key characteristics
| 9909.HK | 1398.HK | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -8.60% | 32.23% |
| 1Y Return | -15.55% | 35.05% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -45.05% | 12.18% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.32 | 1.31 |
| Sortino Ratio | -0.08 | 2.01 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.99 | 1.24 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.20 | 1.01 |
| Martin Ratio | -0.96 | 7.00 |
| Ulcer Index | 19.44% | 4.31% |
| Daily Std Dev | 58.99% | 23.06% |
| Max Drawdown | -91.72% | -61.25% |
| Current Drawdown | -90.09% | -2.89% |
Fundamentals
| 9909.HK | 1398.HK | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | HK$1.60B | HK$2.19T |
| EPS | HK$0.00 | HK$1.00 |
| PE Ratio | 3.72 | 4.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between 9909.HK and 1398.HK is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
9909.HK vs. 1398.HK - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, 9909.HK achieves a -8.60% return, which is significantly lower than 1398.HK's 32.23% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
9909.HK vs. 1398.HK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Powerlong Commercial Mgmt Holdings (9909.HK) and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (1398.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
9909.HK vs. 1398.HK - Dividend Comparison
9909.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%, less than 1398.HK's 7.14% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
9909.HK Powerlong Commercial Mgmt Holdings | 5.88% | 10.75% | 6.97% | 2.28% | 1.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
1398.HK Industrial and Commercial Bank of China | 7.14% | 8.62% | 8.54% | 7.27% | 5.74% | 4.75% | 5.19% | 4.25% | 5.92% | 6.92% | 5.82% | 5.78% |
Drawdowns
9909.HK vs. 1398.HK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 9909.HK drawdown since its inception was -91.72%, which is greater than 1398.HK's maximum drawdown of -61.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 9909.HK and 1398.HK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
9909.HK vs. 1398.HK - Volatility Comparison
Powerlong Commercial Mgmt Holdings (9909.HK) has a higher volatility of 30.73% compared to Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (1398.HK) at 9.87%. This indicates that 9909.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 1398.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
9909.HK vs. 1398.HK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Powerlong Commercial Mgmt Holdings and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities