9866.HK vs. 2238.HK
Compare and contrast key facts about NIO Inc (9866.HK) and Guangzhou Automobile Group Co Ltd (2238.HK).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: 9866.HK or 2238.HK.
Key characteristics
| 9866.HK | 2238.HK | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -55.77% | -13.22% |
| 1Y Return | -49.30% | -28.99% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.88 | -1.06 |
| Daily Std Dev | 64.88% | 31.24% |
| Max Drawdown | -84.68% | -92.22% |
| Current Drawdown | -83.18% | -72.32% |
Fundamentals
| 9866.HK | 2238.HK | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | HK$62.92B | HK$79.08B |
| EPS | -HK$10.88 | HK$0.42 |
| Revenue (TTM) | HK$55.62B | HK$129.71B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | HK$5.14B | HK$4.46B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | -HK$19.28B | -HK$2.71B |
Correlation
The correlation between 9866.HK and 2238.HK is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
9866.HK vs. 2238.HK - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, 9866.HK achieves a -55.77% return, which is significantly lower than 2238.HK's -13.22% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
9866.HK vs. 2238.HK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NIO Inc (9866.HK) and Guangzhou Automobile Group Co Ltd (2238.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
9866.HK vs. 2238.HK - Dividend Comparison
9866.HK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 2238.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.17%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
9866.HK NIO Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
2238.HK Guangzhou Automobile Group Co Ltd | 8.17% | 7.09% | 5.06% | 3.12% | 2.29% | 3.86% | 8.25% | 1.97% | 2.52% | 2.87% | 3.21% | 1.19% |
Drawdowns
9866.HK vs. 2238.HK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 9866.HK drawdown since its inception was -84.68%, smaller than the maximum 2238.HK drawdown of -92.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 9866.HK and 2238.HK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
9866.HK vs. 2238.HK - Volatility Comparison
NIO Inc (9866.HK) has a higher volatility of 18.41% compared to Guangzhou Automobile Group Co Ltd (2238.HK) at 14.02%. This indicates that 9866.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2238.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
9866.HK vs. 2238.HK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NIO Inc and Guangzhou Automobile Group Co Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities