6055.HK vs. PM
Compare and contrast key facts about China Tobacco International HK Co Ltd (6055.HK) and Philip Morris International Inc. (PM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: 6055.HK or PM.
Key characteristics
6055.HK | PM | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 21.78% | 3.51% |
1Y Return | 27.22% | 4.69% |
3Y Return (Ann) | -11.40% | 5.83% |
Sharpe Ratio | 0.56 | 0.13 |
Daily Std Dev | 40.93% | 16.12% |
Max Drawdown | -71.20% | -42.87% |
Current Drawdown | -53.38% | -3.14% |
Fundamentals
6055.HK | PM | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | HK$8.34B | $147.71B |
EPS | HK$0.00 | $5.12 |
PE Ratio | 13.86 | 18.56 |
Revenue (TTM) | HK$11.84B | $35.95B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | HK$843.94M | $20.53B |
EBITDA (TTM) | HK$975.86M | $14.47B |
Correlation
The correlation between 6055.HK and PM is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
6055.HK vs. PM - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, 6055.HK achieves a 21.78% return, which is significantly higher than PM's 3.51% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
6055.HK vs. PM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Tobacco International HK Co Ltd (6055.HK) and Philip Morris International Inc. (PM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
6055.HK vs. PM - Dividend Comparison
6055.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than PM's 5.38% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
China Tobacco International HK Co Ltd | 1.66% | 2.03% | 1.46% | 0.25% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Philip Morris International Inc. | 5.38% | 5.46% | 4.98% | 5.16% | 5.73% | 5.43% | 6.73% | 3.99% | 4.50% | 4.60% | 4.76% | 4.11% |
Drawdowns
6055.HK vs. PM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 6055.HK drawdown since its inception was -71.20%, which is greater than PM's maximum drawdown of -42.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 6055.HK and PM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
6055.HK vs. PM - Volatility Comparison
China Tobacco International HK Co Ltd (6055.HK) has a higher volatility of 10.65% compared to Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) at 6.87%. This indicates that 6055.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
6055.HK vs. PM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Tobacco International HK Co Ltd and Philip Morris International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities