4GLD.DE vs. EUNL.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Xetra-Gold ETF (4GLD.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE).
4GLD.DE and EUNL.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 4GLD.DE is a passively managed fund by Xetra that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price. It was launched on Nov 27, 2007. EUNL.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2009. Both 4GLD.DE and EUNL.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: 4GLD.DE or EUNL.DE.
Correlation
The correlation between 4GLD.DE and EUNL.DE is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
4GLD.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
4GLD.DE:
3.02
EUNL.DE:
2.05
4GLD.DE:
3.98
EUNL.DE:
2.82
4GLD.DE:
1.54
EUNL.DE:
1.41
4GLD.DE:
7.96
EUNL.DE:
2.93
4GLD.DE:
18.72
EUNL.DE:
13.58
4GLD.DE:
2.32%
EUNL.DE:
1.76%
4GLD.DE:
14.33%
EUNL.DE:
11.61%
4GLD.DE:
-36.79%
EUNL.DE:
-33.63%
4GLD.DE:
0.00%
EUNL.DE:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 4GLD.DE achieves a 7.73% return, which is significantly higher than EUNL.DE's 4.79% return. Over the past 10 years, 4GLD.DE has underperformed EUNL.DE with an annualized return of 9.31%, while EUNL.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.08% annualized return.
4GLD.DE
7.73%
5.26%
21.58%
43.40%
13.78%
9.31%
EUNL.DE
4.79%
2.14%
15.06%
25.40%
12.72%
11.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
4GLD.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
4GLD.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than EUNL.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
4GLD.DE vs. EUNL.DE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
4GLD.DE
EUNL.DE
4GLD.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xetra-Gold ETF (4GLD.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
4GLD.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 4GLD.DE nor EUNL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
4GLD.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 4GLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.79%, which is greater than EUNL.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 4GLD.DE and EUNL.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
4GLD.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xetra-Gold ETF (4GLD.DE) is 2.71%, while iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that 4GLD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUNL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.