PortfoliosLab logo
3V64.DE vs. CCH.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between 3V64.DE and CCH.L is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

3V64.DE vs. CCH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Visa Inc (3V64.DE) and Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

3V64.DE:

0.66

CCH.L:

2.19

Sortino Ratio

3V64.DE:

0.92

CCH.L:

2.98

Omega Ratio

3V64.DE:

1.13

CCH.L:

1.39

Calmar Ratio

3V64.DE:

0.70

CCH.L:

5.34

Martin Ratio

3V64.DE:

1.96

CCH.L:

14.18

Ulcer Index

3V64.DE:

6.91%

CCH.L:

3.12%

Daily Std Dev

3V64.DE:

22.92%

CCH.L:

20.84%

Max Drawdown

3V64.DE:

-44.13%

CCH.L:

-48.58%

Current Drawdown

3V64.DE:

-15.28%

CCH.L:

-2.73%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

3V64.DE:

€574.59B

CCH.L:

£14.08B

EPS

3V64.DE:

€8.65

CCH.L:

£1.92

PE Ratio

3V64.DE:

33.99

CCH.L:

20.17

PEG Ratio

3V64.DE:

1.94

CCH.L:

2.01

PS Ratio

3V64.DE:

15.27

CCH.L:

1.31

PB Ratio

3V64.DE:

17.80

CCH.L:

5.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

3V64.DE:

€37.62B

CCH.L:

£10.75B

Gross Profit (TTM)

3V64.DE:

€30.13B

CCH.L:

£3.88B

EBITDA (TTM)

3V64.DE:

€25.60B

CCH.L:

£1.49B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3V64.DE achieves a -2.48% return, which is significantly lower than CCH.L's 44.09% return. Over the past 10 years, 3V64.DE has outperformed CCH.L with an annualized return of 17.89%, while CCH.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.71% annualized return.


3V64.DE

YTD

-2.48%

1M

-5.70%

6M

-2.35%

1Y

15.11%

3Y*

16.10%

5Y*

12.32%

10Y*

17.89%

CCH.L

YTD

44.09%

1M

-1.78%

6M

45.37%

1Y

45.80%

3Y*

33.33%

5Y*

16.82%

10Y*

13.71%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Visa Inc

Coca Cola HBC AG

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3V64.DE vs. CCH.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3V64.DE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of 3V64.DE is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of 3V64.DE is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of 3V64.DE is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of 3V64.DE is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of 3V64.DE is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of 3V64.DE is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

CCH.L
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CCH.L is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CCH.L is 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CCH.L is 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CCH.L is 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CCH.L is 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CCH.L is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

3V64.DE vs. CCH.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Visa Inc (3V64.DE) and Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current 3V64.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the CCH.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3V64.DE and CCH.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

3V64.DE vs. CCH.L - Dividend Comparison

3V64.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than CCH.L's 1.98% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
3V64.DE
Visa Inc
0.62%0.57%0.63%0.67%0.51%0.53%0.48%0.56%0.55%0.78%0.54%0.50%
CCH.L
Coca Cola HBC AG
1.98%2.51%2.52%2.66%1.87%1.93%5.76%1.63%1.34%1.68%1.85%2.13%

Drawdowns

3V64.DE vs. CCH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3V64.DE drawdown since its inception was -44.13%, smaller than the maximum CCH.L drawdown of -48.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3V64.DE and CCH.L.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

3V64.DE vs. CCH.L - Volatility Comparison

Visa Inc (3V64.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.48% compared to Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L) at 3.59%. This indicates that 3V64.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

3V64.DE vs. CCH.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Visa Inc and Coca Cola HBC AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20212022202320242025
9.59B
5.58B
(3V64.DE) Total Revenue
(CCH.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. 3V64.DE values in EUR, CCH.L values in GBp

3V64.DE vs. CCH.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Visa Inc and Coca Cola HBC AG over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
80.4%
36.0%
(3V64.DE) Gross Margin
(CCH.L) Gross Margin
3V64.DE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Visa Inc reported a gross profit of 7.71B and revenue of 9.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.4%.

CCH.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Coca Cola HBC AG reported a gross profit of 2.01B and revenue of 5.58B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.0%.

3V64.DE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Visa Inc reported an operating income of 5.44B and revenue of 9.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 56.7%.

CCH.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Coca Cola HBC AG reported an operating income of 619.30M and revenue of 5.58B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.

3V64.DE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Visa Inc reported a net income of 4.58B and revenue of 9.59B, resulting in a net margin of 47.7%.

CCH.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Coca Cola HBC AG reported a net income of 439.00M and revenue of 5.58B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.