PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
3988.HK vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


3988.HKVOO
YTD Return29.53%11.78%
1Y Return27.70%28.27%
3Y Return (Ann)16.88%10.42%
5Y Return (Ann)10.30%15.03%
10Y Return (Ann)8.07%13.05%
Sharpe Ratio1.222.56
Daily Std Dev19.91%11.55%
Max Drawdown-66.11%-33.99%
Current Drawdown-0.26%-0.04%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between 3988.HK and VOO is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

3988.HK vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, 3988.HK achieves a 29.53% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 11.78% return. Over the past 10 years, 3988.HK has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 8.07%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.05% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
128.90%
523.51%
3988.HK
VOO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Bank of China Limited

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3988.HK vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bank of China Limited (3988.HK) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3988.HK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for 3988.HK, currently valued at 1.85, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.85
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for 3988.HK, currently valued at 2.85, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.85
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for 3988.HK, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.34
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for 3988.HK, currently valued at 2.09, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.09
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for 3988.HK, currently valued at 8.20, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.008.20
VOO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VOO, currently valued at 2.48, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.002.48
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VOO, currently valued at 3.50, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.50
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VOO, currently valued at 1.44, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.44
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VOO, currently valued at 2.41, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.41
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VOO, currently valued at 9.66, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.009.66

3988.HK vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3988.HK Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of 3988.HK and VOO.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.85
2.48
3988.HK
VOO

Dividends

3988.HK vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

3988.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.53%, more than VOO's 1.32% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
3988.HK
Bank of China Limited
6.53%8.45%9.12%8.46%7.90%6.33%6.26%5.01%6.02%6.86%5.65%6.15%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.32%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%1.84%

Drawdowns

3988.HK vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3988.HK drawdown since its inception was -66.11%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3988.HK and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.26%
-0.04%
3988.HK
VOO

Volatility

3988.HK vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Bank of China Limited (3988.HK) has a higher volatility of 8.49% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.37%. This indicates that 3988.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
8.49%
3.37%
3988.HK
VOO