3988.HK vs. AACFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Bank of China Limited (3988.HK) and Invesco Greater China Fund (AACFX).
AACFX is managed by Invesco. It was launched on Mar 30, 2006.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: 3988.HK or AACFX.
Correlation
The correlation between 3988.HK and AACFX is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
3988.HK vs. AACFX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
Returns By Period
3988.HK
20.41%
11.59%
26.78%
43.69%
19.99%
6.15%
AACFX
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
3988.HK vs. AACFX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
3988.HK
AACFX
3988.HK vs. AACFX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bank of China Limited (3988.HK) and Invesco Greater China Fund (AACFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
3988.HK vs. AACFX - Dividend Comparison
3988.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.61%, while AACFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3988.HK Bank of China Limited | 11.61% | 6.53% | 8.45% | 9.12% | 8.46% | 7.90% | 6.33% | 6.26% | 5.01% | 6.02% | 6.86% | 5.65% |
AACFX Invesco Greater China Fund | 1.28% | 1.10% | 1.94% | 1.62% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 0.54% | 0.73% | 1.07% | 0.45% |
Drawdowns
3988.HK vs. AACFX - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
3988.HK vs. AACFX - Volatility Comparison
Bank of China Limited (3988.HK) has a higher volatility of 12.70% compared to Invesco Greater China Fund (AACFX) at 0.00%. This indicates that 3988.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AACFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.