PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2B7A.DE vs. VOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

2B7A.DE vs. VOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (2B7A.DE) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

2B7A.DE is traded in EUR, while VOOG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VOOG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2B7A.DE achieves a 3.01% return, which is significantly lower than VOOG's 11.53% return.


2B7A.DE

1D
-2.24%
1M
-4.22%
YTD
3.01%
6M
1.01%
1Y
8.20%
3Y*
9.59%
5Y*
9.44%
10Y*

VOOG

1D
-3.02%
1M
2.24%
YTD
11.53%
6M
9.57%
1Y
28.74%
3Y*
23.41%
5Y*
16.37%
10Y*
17.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2B7A.DE vs. VOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
2B7A.DE
iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc
3.01%2.79%29.83%-11.29%8.44%28.42%-10.08%27.08%8.53%-7.26%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
11.53%7.62%44.86%26.06%-25.11%41.82%22.36%33.89%4.47%4.61%

Correlation

The correlation between 2B7A.DE and VOOG is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2017

0.13

The correlation between 2B7A.DE and VOOG shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (3 years) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2B7A.DE vs. VOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2B7A.DE
2B7A.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
2B7A.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B7A.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B7A.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
2B7A.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B7A.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

VOOG
VOOG Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
VOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2B7A.DE vs. VOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (2B7A.DE) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2B7A.DEVOOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.31

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

2.28

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.49

7.99

-6.50

2B7A.DE vs. VOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2B7A.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the VOOG Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2B7A.DE and VOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2B7A.DEVOOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

1.78

-1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.78

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.91

-0.48

Drawdowns

2B7A.DE vs. VOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2B7A.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.70%, which is greater than VOOG's maximum drawdown of -30.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B7A.DE and VOOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2B7A.DEVOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.70%

-30.89%

-4.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.22%

-12.66%

+3.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.84%

-27.11%

+10.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.81%

-27.11%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.77%

-3.96%

-4.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.03%

-5.02%

-5.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.48%

3.60%

+0.88%

Volatility

2B7A.DE vs. VOOG - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (2B7A.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) at 4.76%. This indicates that 2B7A.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2B7A.DEVOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.01%

4.76%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.01%

12.12%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.74%

16.28%

-1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.01%

20.95%

-3.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.65%

21.11%

-1.46%

2B7A.DE vs. VOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

2B7A.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VOOG's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

2B7A.DE vs. VOOG - Dividend Comparison

2B7A.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
2B7A.DE
iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.45%0.49%0.49%1.12%0.93%0.53%0.88%1.26%1.34%1.32%1.47%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


2B7A.DE and VOOG have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VOOG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VOOG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for 2B7A.DE.

2B7A.DE is categorized as Utilities Equities, while VOOG is S&P 500. 2B7A.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Utilities, while VOOG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for 2B7A.DE and 0.07% for VOOG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2B7A.DE and VOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer