2688.HK vs. 1883.HK
Compare and contrast key facts about ENN Energy Holdings Ltd (2688.HK) and CITIC Telecom International Holdings Ltd (1883.HK).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: 2688.HK or 1883.HK.
Key characteristics
| 2688.HK | 1883.HK | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 11.13% | -22.26% |
| 1Y Return | -38.77% | -14.60% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -18.46% | 5.06% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -0.94% | 2.97% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 3.54% | 5.86% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.72 | -0.71 |
| Daily Std Dev | 49.66% | 23.33% |
| Max Drawdown | -70.00% | -85.68% |
| Current Drawdown | -61.43% | -22.49% |
Fundamentals
| 2688.HK | 1883.HK | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | HK$69.46B | HK$9.36B |
| EPS | HK$0.00 | HK$0.00 |
| PE Ratio | 9.40 | 7.67 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.43 | 0.00 |
| Revenue (TTM) | HK$113.86B | HK$9.99B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | HK$15.76B | HK$4.04B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | HK$11.41B | HK$2.40B |
Correlation
The correlation between 2688.HK and 1883.HK is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
2688.HK vs. 1883.HK - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, 2688.HK achieves a 11.13% return, which is significantly higher than 1883.HK's -22.26% return. Over the past 10 years, 2688.HK has underperformed 1883.HK with an annualized return of 3.54%, while 1883.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 5.86% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
2688.HK vs. 1883.HK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ENN Energy Holdings Ltd (2688.HK) and CITIC Telecom International Holdings Ltd (1883.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
2688.HK vs. 1883.HK - Dividend Comparison
2688.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, less than 1883.HK's 9.61% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2688.HK ENN Energy Holdings Ltd | 4.55% | 5.06% | 2.51% | 1.83% | 1.48% | 1.40% | 1.56% | 1.49% | 2.38% | 2.01% | 1.09% | 0.74% |
1883.HK CITIC Telecom International Holdings Ltd | 9.61% | 7.47% | 8.68% | 8.14% | 8.20% | 6.69% | 6.18% | 6.45% | 5.39% | 3.85% | 3.54% | 3.59% |
Drawdowns
2688.HK vs. 1883.HK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2688.HK drawdown since its inception was -70.00%, smaller than the maximum 1883.HK drawdown of -85.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2688.HK and 1883.HK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
2688.HK vs. 1883.HK - Volatility Comparison
ENN Energy Holdings Ltd (2688.HK) has a higher volatility of 14.51% compared to CITIC Telecom International Holdings Ltd (1883.HK) at 6.19%. This indicates that 2688.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 1883.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
2688.HK vs. 1883.HK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ENN Energy Holdings Ltd and CITIC Telecom International Holdings Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities