2282.HK vs. NVDA

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about MGM China Holdings Ltd (2282.HK) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA).

Performance

2282.HK vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in MGM China Holdings Ltd (2282.HK) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

2282.HK vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
2282.HK MGM China Holdings Ltd	-13.50%	38.67%	5.65%	15.23%	81.82%	-64.49%	5.64%	-2.11%	-43.95%	49.58%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	-5.11%	39.18%	169.85%	238.98%	-50.18%	126.71%	121.30%	76.01%	-30.66%	83.39%

Different Trading Currencies

2282.HK is traded in HKD, while NVDA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NVDA values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2282.HK achieves a -13.50% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's -5.11% return. Over the past 10 years, 2282.HK has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 1.52%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 69.93% annualized return.

2282.HK

• 1D: 2.44%
• 1M: -8.40%
• YTD: -13.50%
• 6M: -31.81%
• 1Y: 10.64%
• 3Y*: 8.99%
• 5Y*: -1.73%
• 10Y*: 1.52%

NVDA

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: -3.49%
• YTD: -5.11%
• 6M: -5.46%
• 1Y: 60.73%
• 3Y*: 84.91%
• 5Y*: 66.66%
• 10Y*: 69.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

2282.HK vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2282.HK

2282.HK Risk / Return Rank: 46
2282.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
2282.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
2282.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 45
2282.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
2282.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 45

NVDA

NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 82
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 77
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2282.HK vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MGM China Holdings Ltd (2282.HK) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	2282.HK	NVDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.27	1.48	-1.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.62	2.17	-1.55
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.27	-0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.18	3.24	-3.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.45	8.02	-7.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

2282.HK vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2282.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2282.HK and NVDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	2282.HK	NVDA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27	1.48	-1.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.04	1.30	-1.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.03	1.41	-1.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.01	0.74	-0.73

Correlation

The correlation between 2282.HK and NVDA is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

2282.HK vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

2282.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than NVDA's 0.02% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
2282.HK MGM China Holdings Ltd	4.97%	4.30%	7.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.62%	1.01%	1.23%	1.17%	1.32%	12.55%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	0.02%	0.02%	0.03%	0.03%	0.11%	0.05%	0.12%	0.27%	0.46%	0.29%	0.45%	1.20%

Drawdowns

2282.HK vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2282.HK drawdown since its inception was -89.52%, which is greater than NVDA's maximum drawdown of -85.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2282.HK and NVDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	2282.HK	NVDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.52%	-89.72%	+0.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.13%	-20.21%	-15.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-77.37%	-66.34%	-11.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-87.25%	-66.34%	-20.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.67%	-15.10%	-42.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-49.56%	-36.40%	-13.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.78%	8.05%	+6.73%

Volatility

2282.HK vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

MGM China Holdings Ltd (2282.HK) has a higher volatility of 12.21% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 10.40%. This indicates that 2282.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	2282.HK	NVDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.21%	10.40%	+1.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.92%	25.76%	+5.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.11%	41.40%	-0.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.95%	51.71%	-1.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.34%	49.83%	-4.49%

Financials