2238.HK vs. 9866.HK
Compare and contrast key facts about Guangzhou Automobile Group Co Ltd (2238.HK) and NIO Inc (9866.HK).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: 2238.HK or 9866.HK.
Key characteristics
| 2238.HK | 9866.HK | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -7.16% | -42.80% |
| 1Y Return | -24.68% | -30.76% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.82 | -0.51 |
| Daily Std Dev | 31.39% | 68.51% |
| Max Drawdown | -92.22% | -84.68% |
| Current Drawdown | -70.39% | -78.24% |
Fundamentals
| 2238.HK | 9866.HK | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | HK$81.06B | HK$83.79B |
| EPS | HK$0.40 | -HK$8.37 |
| Revenue (TTM) | HK$124.72B | HK$55.62B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | HK$4.46B | HK$5.14B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | -HK$3.07B | -HK$19.28B |
Correlation
The correlation between 2238.HK and 9866.HK is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
2238.HK vs. 9866.HK - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, 2238.HK achieves a -7.16% return, which is significantly higher than 9866.HK's -42.80% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
2238.HK vs. 9866.HK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guangzhou Automobile Group Co Ltd (2238.HK) and NIO Inc (9866.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
2238.HK vs. 9866.HK - Dividend Comparison
2238.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.64%, while 9866.HK has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2238.HK Guangzhou Automobile Group Co Ltd | 7.64% | 7.09% | 5.06% | 3.12% | 2.29% | 3.86% | 8.25% | 1.97% | 2.52% | 2.87% | 3.21% | 1.19% |
9866.HK NIO Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
2238.HK vs. 9866.HK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2238.HK drawdown since its inception was -92.22%, which is greater than 9866.HK's maximum drawdown of -84.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2238.HK and 9866.HK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
2238.HK vs. 9866.HK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Guangzhou Automobile Group Co Ltd (2238.HK) is 8.10%, while NIO Inc (9866.HK) has a volatility of 25.17%. This indicates that 2238.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 9866.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
2238.HK vs. 9866.HK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Guangzhou Automobile Group Co Ltd and NIO Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities