1299.HK vs. SPUS
Compare and contrast key facts about AIA Group Ltd (1299.HK) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS).
SPUS is a passively managed fund by Toroso Investments that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index. It was launched on Dec 18, 2019.
Performance
1299.HK vs. SPUS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Different Trading Currencies
1299.HK is traded in HKD, while SPUS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPUS values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 1299.HK achieves a 7.82% return, which is significantly higher than SPUS's -3.99% return.
1299.HK
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 7.82%
- 6M
- 16.03%
- 1Y
- 48.40%
- 3Y*
- 3.57%
- 5Y*
- 0.24%
- 10Y*
- 9.21%
SPUS
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -3.55%
- YTD
- -3.99%
- 6M
- -1.54%
- 1Y
- 40.39%
- 3Y*
- 19.54%
- 5Y*
- 14.12%
- 10Y*
- —
1299.HK vs. SPUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1299.HK AIA Group Ltd | 7.82% | 45.95% | -15.02% | -19.98% | 12.60% | -16.49% | 18.84% | 0.62% |
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | -3.99% | 20.01% | 25.84% | 34.23% | -22.63% | 36.65% | 25.11% | 0.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between 1299.HK and SPUS is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. They neither move together nor in opposition — each responds to its own set of market drivers. This independence makes them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
1299.HK vs. SPUS — Risk / Return Rank
1299.HK
SPUS
1299.HK vs. SPUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AIA Group Ltd (1299.HK) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 1299.HK | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.40 | 1.20 | +0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.93 | 1.83 | +0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.27 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 2.03 | +0.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.69 | 8.76 | +0.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 1299.HK | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 1.20 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.74 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.77 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
1299.HK vs. SPUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 1299.HK drawdown since its inception was -55.42%, which is greater than SPUS's maximum drawdown of -30.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1299.HK and SPUS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| 1299.HK | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.42% | -30.80% | -24.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.26% | -10.66% | -5.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.42% | -28.06% | -25.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.81% | -6.91% | -4.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.52% | -6.35% | -8.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.30% | 3.04% | +2.26% |
Volatility
1299.HK vs. SPUS - Volatility Comparison
AIA Group Ltd (1299.HK) has a higher volatility of 15.92% compared to SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) at 5.99%. This indicates that 1299.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| 1299.HK | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.92% | 5.99% | +9.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.61% | 11.21% | +14.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.66% | 20.90% | +13.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.24% | 19.17% | +13.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.83% | 21.39% | +8.44% |
Dividends
1299.HK vs. SPUS - Dividend Comparison
1299.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, more than SPUS's 0.63% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1299.HK AIA Group Ltd | 2.09% | 2.25% | 2.91% | 2.29% | 1.71% | 1.76% | 1.34% | 1.56% | 1.59% | 1.34% | 1.67% | 1.13% |
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | 0.63% | 0.60% | 0.70% | 0.87% | 1.21% | 1.15% | 1.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |