PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
1121.HK vs. 2238.HK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


1121.HK2238.HK
YTD Return7.81%-13.22%
1Y Return-44.95%-28.99%
3Y Return (Ann)-12.96%-20.01%
5Y Return (Ann)62.15%-15.49%
10Y Return (Ann)32.68%-1.81%
Sharpe Ratio-0.82-1.06
Daily Std Dev58.97%31.24%
Max Drawdown-84.85%-92.22%
Current Drawdown-74.76%-72.32%

Fundamentals


1121.HK2238.HK
Market CapHK$8.19BHK$79.08B
EPSHK$0.00HK$0.42
PE Ratio2.13K6.91
Revenue (TTM)HK$295.35MHK$129.71B
Gross Profit (TTM)HK$88.52MHK$4.46B
EBITDA (TTM)-HK$322.04M-HK$2.71B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between 1121.HK and 2238.HK is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

1121.HK vs. 2238.HK - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, 1121.HK achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly higher than 2238.HK's -13.22% return. Over the past 10 years, 1121.HK has outperformed 2238.HK with an annualized return of 32.68%, while 2238.HK has yielded a comparatively lower -1.81% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-36.21%
-13.83%
1121.HK
2238.HK

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Golden Solar New Energy Technology Holdings Ltd

Guangzhou Automobile Group Co Ltd

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1121.HK vs. 2238.HK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Golden Solar New Energy Technology Holdings Ltd (1121.HK) and Guangzhou Automobile Group Co Ltd (2238.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


1121.HK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for 1121.HK, currently valued at -0.82, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00-0.82
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for 1121.HK, currently valued at -1.11, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-1.11
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for 1121.HK, currently valued at 0.85, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.85
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for 1121.HK, currently valued at -0.61, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.006.00-0.61
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for 1121.HK, currently valued at -1.48, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-1.48
2238.HK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for 2238.HK, currently valued at -1.09, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00-1.09
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for 2238.HK, currently valued at -1.68, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-1.68
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for 2238.HK, currently valued at 0.82, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.82
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for 2238.HK, currently valued at -0.46, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.006.00-0.46
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for 2238.HK, currently valued at -1.43, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-1.43

1121.HK vs. 2238.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1121.HK Sharpe Ratio is -0.82, which roughly equals the 2238.HK Sharpe Ratio of -1.06. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of 1121.HK and 2238.HK.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.60-1.40-1.20-1.00-0.80-0.60-0.40-0.20NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-0.82
-1.09
1121.HK
2238.HK

Dividends

1121.HK vs. 2238.HK - Dividend Comparison

1121.HK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 2238.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.17%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
1121.HK
Golden Solar New Energy Technology Holdings Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
2238.HK
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co Ltd
8.17%7.09%5.06%3.12%2.29%3.86%8.25%1.97%2.52%2.87%3.21%1.19%

Drawdowns

1121.HK vs. 2238.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1121.HK drawdown since its inception was -84.85%, smaller than the maximum 2238.HK drawdown of -92.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1121.HK and 2238.HK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-75.00%-70.00%-65.00%-60.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-74.91%
-72.41%
1121.HK
2238.HK

Volatility

1121.HK vs. 2238.HK - Volatility Comparison

Golden Solar New Energy Technology Holdings Ltd (1121.HK) has a higher volatility of 23.23% compared to Guangzhou Automobile Group Co Ltd (2238.HK) at 14.02%. This indicates that 1121.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2238.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
23.23%
14.02%
1121.HK
2238.HK

Financials

1121.HK vs. 2238.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Golden Solar New Energy Technology Holdings Ltd and Guangzhou Automobile Group Co Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in HKD except per share items