PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
0R2V.L vs. HTGC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


0R2V.LHTGC
YTD Return12.45%24.60%
1Y Return22.67%30.00%
3Y Return (Ann)14.69%17.78%
5Y Return (Ann)32.29%20.68%
10Y Return (Ann)59.23%13.95%
Sharpe Ratio0.781.32
Daily Std Dev28.93%22.51%
Max Drawdown-61.04%-68.29%
Current Drawdown-8.33%-8.08%

Fundamentals


0R2V.LHTGC
EPS$12.73$1.79

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between 0R2V.L and HTGC is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

0R2V.L vs. HTGC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, 0R2V.L achieves a 12.45% return, which is significantly lower than HTGC's 24.60% return. Over the past 10 years, 0R2V.L has outperformed HTGC with an annualized return of 59.23%, while HTGC has yielded a comparatively lower 13.95% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
23.12%
10.96%
0R2V.L
HTGC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

0R2V.L vs. HTGC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple Inc. (0R2V.L) and Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


0R2V.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for 0R2V.L, currently valued at 0.82, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.82
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for 0R2V.L, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.30
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for 0R2V.L, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.16
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for 0R2V.L, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.001.36
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for 0R2V.L, currently valued at 3.11, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.003.11
HTGC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HTGC, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.32
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for HTGC, currently valued at 1.63, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.63
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for HTGC, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.27
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for HTGC, currently valued at 1.62, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.001.62
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for HTGC, currently valued at 5.78, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.005.78

0R2V.L vs. HTGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0R2V.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the HTGC Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of 0R2V.L and HTGC.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
0.82
1.32
0R2V.L
HTGC

Dividends

0R2V.L vs. HTGC - Dividend Comparison

0R2V.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than HTGC's 8.62% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
0R2V.L
Apple Inc.
0.45%0.49%0.71%0.49%0.59%1.05%1.79%0.00%0.00%0.44%0.00%0.00%
HTGC
Hercules Capital, Inc.
8.62%11.40%14.90%9.34%9.57%9.49%11.40%9.45%8.79%10.17%8.33%6.77%

Drawdowns

0R2V.L vs. HTGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0R2V.L drawdown since its inception was -61.04%, smaller than the maximum HTGC drawdown of -68.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0R2V.L and HTGC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-8.33%
-8.08%
0R2V.L
HTGC

Volatility

0R2V.L vs. HTGC - Volatility Comparison

Apple Inc. (0R2V.L) has a higher volatility of 10.60% compared to Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) at 4.84%. This indicates that 0R2V.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
10.60%
4.84%
0R2V.L
HTGC

Financials

0R2V.L vs. HTGC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Apple Inc. and Hercules Capital, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items