0QPS.L vs. CLNX.MC
Compare and contrast key facts about Givaudan SA (0QPS.L) and Cellnex Telecom SA (CLNX.MC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: 0QPS.L or CLNX.MC.
Key characteristics
| 0QPS.L | CLNX.MC | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 17.55% | -7.82% |
| 1Y Return | 31.78% | -11.61% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.72% | -11.34% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.02% | 7.12% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.48 | -0.51 |
| Daily Std Dev | 20.88% | 25.28% |
| Max Drawdown | -69.02% | -56.90% |
| Current Drawdown | -15.17% | -45.98% |
Fundamentals
| 0QPS.L | CLNX.MC | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | £302.94M | €23.16B |
| EPS | £88.37 | -€0.37 |
| Revenue (TTM) | £6.91B | €3.86B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | £2.76B | €2.89B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | £1.36B | €2.40B |
Correlation
The correlation between 0QPS.L and CLNX.MC is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
0QPS.L vs. CLNX.MC - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, 0QPS.L achieves a 17.55% return, which is significantly higher than CLNX.MC's -7.82% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
0QPS.L vs. CLNX.MC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Givaudan SA (0QPS.L) and Cellnex Telecom SA (CLNX.MC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
0QPS.L vs. CLNX.MC - Dividend Comparison
0QPS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than CLNX.MC's 0.17% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0QPS.L Givaudan SA | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
CLNX.MC Cellnex Telecom SA | 0.17% | 0.16% | 0.17% | 0.13% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.47% | 0.33% | 0.54% | 0.19% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
0QPS.L vs. CLNX.MC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 0QPS.L drawdown since its inception was -69.02%, which is greater than CLNX.MC's maximum drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0QPS.L and CLNX.MC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
0QPS.L vs. CLNX.MC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Givaudan SA (0QPS.L) is 5.29%, while Cellnex Telecom SA (CLNX.MC) has a volatility of 8.76%. This indicates that 0QPS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLNX.MC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
0QPS.L vs. CLNX.MC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Givaudan SA and Cellnex Telecom SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities