PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
0QPS.L vs. CLNX.MC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


0QPS.LCLNX.MC
YTD Return21.03%-8.53%
1Y Return43.26%-11.26%
3Y Return (Ann)-1.41%-15.02%
5Y Return (Ann)9.75%4.48%
Sharpe Ratio2.19-0.41
Daily Std Dev19.65%27.03%
Max Drawdown-69.02%-56.90%
Current Drawdown-12.66%-46.40%

Fundamentals


0QPS.LCLNX.MC
Market Cap£30.39B€23.02B
EPS£88.37-€0.37
Total Revenue (TTM)£5.07B€3.13B
Gross Profit (TTM)£2.03B€503.17M
EBITDA (TTM)£1.02B€2.30B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between 0QPS.L and CLNX.MC is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

0QPS.L vs. CLNX.MC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, 0QPS.L achieves a 21.03% return, which is significantly higher than CLNX.MC's -8.53% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%FebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJuly
107.40%
176.30%
0QPS.L
CLNX.MC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Givaudan SA

Cellnex Telecom SA

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0QPS.L vs. CLNX.MC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Givaudan SA (0QPS.L) and Cellnex Telecom SA (CLNX.MC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


0QPS.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for 0QPS.L, currently valued at 2.38, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.002.38
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for 0QPS.L, currently valued at 3.56, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.56
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for 0QPS.L, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.42
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for 0QPS.L, currently valued at 1.01, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.01
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for 0QPS.L, currently valued at 11.92, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.0011.92
CLNX.MC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLNX.MC, currently valued at -0.41, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00-0.41
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLNX.MC, currently valued at -0.42, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.42
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CLNX.MC, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.95
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLNX.MC, currently valued at -0.20, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.20
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CLNX.MC, currently valued at -0.73, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.00-0.73

0QPS.L vs. CLNX.MC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0QPS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the CLNX.MC Sharpe Ratio of -0.41. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of 0QPS.L and CLNX.MC.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00FebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJuly
2.38
-0.41
0QPS.L
CLNX.MC

Dividends

0QPS.L vs. CLNX.MC - Dividend Comparison

0QPS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than CLNX.MC's 0.18% yield.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017201620152014
0QPS.L
Givaudan SA
0.02%0.02%0.02%0.01%0.02%0.02%0.03%0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%
CLNX.MC
Cellnex Telecom SA
0.18%0.16%0.17%0.13%0.13%0.20%0.47%0.33%0.54%0.19%0.00%

Drawdowns

0QPS.L vs. CLNX.MC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0QPS.L drawdown since its inception was -69.02%, which is greater than CLNX.MC's maximum drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0QPS.L and CLNX.MC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%FebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJuly
-15.75%
-50.08%
0QPS.L
CLNX.MC

Volatility

0QPS.L vs. CLNX.MC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Givaudan SA (0QPS.L) is 4.59%, while Cellnex Telecom SA (CLNX.MC) has a volatility of 8.73%. This indicates that 0QPS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLNX.MC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%FebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJuly
4.59%
8.73%
0QPS.L
CLNX.MC

Financials

0QPS.L vs. CLNX.MC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Givaudan SA and Cellnex Telecom SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. 0QPS.L values in GBP, CLNX.MC values in EUR