0QPS.L vs. CLNX.MC

In the year-to-date period, 0QPS.L achieves a -1.70% return, which is significantly lower than CLNX.MC's 7.24% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Givaudan SA (0QPS.L) and Cellnex Telecom SA (CLNX.MC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current 0QPS.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the CLNX.MC Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0QPS.L and CLNX.MC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

0QPS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CLNX.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%.

The maximum 0QPS.L drawdown since its inception was -69.02%, which is greater than CLNX.MC's maximum drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0QPS.L and CLNX.MC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Givaudan SA (0QPS.L) is 6.74%, while Cellnex Telecom SA (CLNX.MC) has a volatility of 10.43%. This indicates that 0QPS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLNX.MC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Givaudan SA and Cellnex Telecom SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.