0QLR.L vs. RMS.PA

In the year-to-date period, 0QLR.L achieves a 3.09% return, which is significantly lower than RMS.PA's 6.40% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Novartis AG (0QLR.L) and Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current 0QLR.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the RMS.PA Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0QLR.L and RMS.PA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

0QLR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RMS.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%.

The maximum 0QLR.L drawdown since its inception was -19.20%, smaller than the maximum RMS.PA drawdown of -47.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0QLR.L and RMS.PA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Novartis AG (0QLR.L) has a higher volatility of 10.82% compared to Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA) at 9.35%. This indicates that 0QLR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RMS.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Novartis AG and Hermès International Société en commandite par actions. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.