PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0QLR.L vs. ^SSMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

0QLR.L vs. ^SSMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Novartis AG (0QLR.L) and Swiss Market Index (^SSMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

0QLR.L vs. ^SSMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
0QLR.L
Novartis AG
11.88%23.74%4.99%5.58%4.77%4.00%
^SSMI
Swiss Market Index
-0.89%21.67%-1.63%8.32%-8.07%26.65%
Different Trading Currencies

0QLR.L is traded in GBP, while ^SSMI is traded in CHF. To make them comparable, the ^SSMI values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0QLR.L achieves a 11.88% return, which is significantly higher than ^SSMI's -0.89% return.


0QLR.L

1D
1.42%
1M
-4.96%
YTD
11.88%
6M
18.64%
1Y
22.46%
3Y*
15.59%
5Y*
9.75%
10Y*

^SSMI

1D
1.94%
1M
-6.89%
YTD
-0.89%
6M
7.13%
1Y
10.94%
3Y*
7.81%
5Y*
7.64%
10Y*
8.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

0QLR.L vs. ^SSMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0QLR.L
0QLR.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
0QLR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0QLR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
0QLR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
0QLR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
0QLR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

^SSMI
^SSMI Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
^SSMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^SSMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
^SSMI Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
^SSMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
^SSMI Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0QLR.L vs. ^SSMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Novartis AG (0QLR.L) and Swiss Market Index (^SSMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


0QLR.L^SSMIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.07

0.68

+0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.50

1.02

+0.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.15

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

0.73

+0.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.72

2.59

+2.13

0QLR.L vs. ^SSMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0QLR.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the ^SSMI Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0QLR.L and ^SSMI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


0QLR.L^SSMIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

0.68

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.55

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.37

+0.24

Correlation

The correlation between 0QLR.L and ^SSMI is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Drawdowns

0QLR.L vs. ^SSMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0QLR.L drawdown since its inception was -18.04%, smaller than the maximum ^SSMI drawdown of -31.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0QLR.L and ^SSMI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


0QLR.L^SSMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.04%

-56.31%

+38.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.33%

-13.51%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.04%

-22.34%

+4.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.20%

-7.30%

+1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.35%

-14.60%

+9.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.10%

5.44%

-0.34%

Volatility

0QLR.L vs. ^SSMI - Volatility Comparison

Novartis AG (0QLR.L) and Swiss Market Index (^SSMI) have volatilities of 5.90% and 5.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


0QLR.L^SSMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.90%

5.81%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.34%

9.86%

+3.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.56%

16.38%

+5.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.65%

14.04%

+3.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.58%

14.84%

+2.74%