0P6S.L vs. CF
Compare and contrast key facts about Bayer AG NA (0P6S.L) and CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: 0P6S.L or CF.
Key characteristics
| 0P6S.L | CF | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -15.09% | -7.26% |
| 1Y Return | -50.89% | 10.52% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -18.13% | 12.17% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -12.43% | 14.83% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -10.74% | 7.48% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -1.72 | 0.38 |
| Daily Std Dev | 29.63% | 28.88% |
| Max Drawdown | -81.79% | -76.73% |
| Current Drawdown | -77.83% | -36.17% |
Fundamentals
| 0P6S.L | CF | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | €51.70B | $13.54B |
| Revenue (TTM) | €47.64B | $6.09B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | €31.85B | $5.86B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | €11.33B | $2.66B |
Correlation
The correlation between 0P6S.L and CF is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
0P6S.L vs. CF - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, 0P6S.L achieves a -15.09% return, which is significantly lower than CF's -7.26% return. Over the past 10 years, 0P6S.L has underperformed CF with an annualized return of -10.74%, while CF has yielded a comparatively higher 7.48% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
0P6S.L vs. CF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bayer AG NA (0P6S.L) and CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
0P6S.L vs. CF - Dividend Comparison
0P6S.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than CF's 2.32% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0P6S.L Bayer AG NA | 0.39% | 7.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.64% | 2.59% | 1.97% | 1.89% | 1.87% |
CF CF Industries Holdings, Inc. | 2.32% | 2.01% | 1.76% | 1.70% | 3.10% | 2.51% | 2.76% | 2.82% | 3.81% | 2.94% | 1.83% | 0.94% |
Drawdowns
0P6S.L vs. CF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 0P6S.L drawdown since its inception was -81.79%, which is greater than CF's maximum drawdown of -76.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0P6S.L and CF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
0P6S.L vs. CF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bayer AG NA (0P6S.L) is 6.92%, while CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) has a volatility of 7.83%. This indicates that 0P6S.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
0P6S.L vs. CF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bayer AG NA and CF Industries Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities