0P2N.L vs. AAPL
Compare and contrast key facts about Ferrovial (0P2N.L) and Apple Inc (AAPL).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: 0P2N.L or AAPL.
Key characteristics
0P2N.L | AAPL | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 13.22% | 15.14% |
1Y Return | 30.69% | 17.02% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 16.56% | 13.38% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 9.32% | 33.88% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 12.15% | 26.02% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.75 | 0.76 |
Daily Std Dev | 17.71% | 22.53% |
Max Drawdown | -70.86% | -81.80% |
Current Drawdown | -3.92% | -5.84% |
Fundamentals
0P2N.L | AAPL | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | €19.07B | $3.36T |
EPS | €1.62 | $6.57 |
PE Ratio | 0.16 | 33.61 |
Total Revenue (TTM) | €4.57B | $385.60B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | €3.94B | $177.23B |
EBITDA (TTM) | €596.00M | $131.78B |
Correlation
The correlation between 0P2N.L and AAPL is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
0P2N.L vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, 0P2N.L achieves a 13.22% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's 15.14% return. Over the past 10 years, 0P2N.L has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 12.15%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 26.02% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
0P2N.L vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ferrovial (0P2N.L) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
0P2N.L vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison
0P2N.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, more than AAPL's 0.44% yield.
Drawdowns
0P2N.L vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 0P2N.L drawdown since its inception was -70.86%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0P2N.L and AAPL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
0P2N.L vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ferrovial (0P2N.L) is 4.53%, while Apple Inc (AAPL) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that 0P2N.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
0P2N.L vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ferrovial and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities