PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
0939.HK vs. 2333.HK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


0939.HK2333.HK
YTD Return21.29%23.27%
1Y Return13.23%28.29%
3Y Return (Ann)4.74%-10.24%
5Y Return (Ann)4.38%22.30%
10Y Return (Ann)7.19%7.88%
Sharpe Ratio0.841.00
Daily Std Dev21.24%44.10%
Max Drawdown-69.85%-99.62%
Current Drawdown-8.06%-98.34%

Fundamentals


0939.HK2333.HK
Market CapHK$1.43THK$204.14B
EPSHK$1.34HK$1.38
PE Ratio3.979.77
PEG Ratio0.792.99
Revenue (TTM)HK$620.10BHK$187.03B
Gross Profit (TTM)HK$667.93BHK$8.01B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between 0939.HK and 2333.HK is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

0939.HK vs. 2333.HK - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, 0939.HK achieves a 21.29% return, which is significantly lower than 2333.HK's 23.27% return. Over the past 10 years, 0939.HK has underperformed 2333.HK with an annualized return of 7.19%, while 2333.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 7.88% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%1,000.00%2,000.00%3,000.00%4,000.00%5,000.00%6,000.00%7,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
512.75%
6,655.50%
0939.HK
2333.HK

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


China Construction Bank Corp

Great Wall Motor Co Ltd

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0939.HK vs. 2333.HK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Construction Bank Corp (0939.HK) and Great Wall Motor Co Ltd (2333.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


0939.HK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for 0939.HK, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.000.92
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for 0939.HK, currently valued at 1.53, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.53
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for 0939.HK, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.18
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for 0939.HK, currently valued at 0.58, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.58
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for 0939.HK, currently valued at 1.74, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.74
2333.HK
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for 2333.HK, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.001.02
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for 2333.HK, currently valued at 1.71, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.71
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for 2333.HK, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.19
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for 2333.HK, currently valued at 0.45, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.45
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for 2333.HK, currently valued at 2.77, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.002.77

0939.HK vs. 2333.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0939.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which roughly equals the 2333.HK Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of 0939.HK and 2333.HK.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.92
1.02
0939.HK
2333.HK

Dividends

0939.HK vs. 2333.HK - Dividend Comparison

0939.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.48%, more than 2333.HK's 2.63% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
0939.HK
China Construction Bank Corp
7.48%9.08%8.71%7.24%5.94%5.19%5.34%4.44%5.41%7.18%5.93%5.76%
2333.HK
Great Wall Motor Co Ltd
2.63%3.24%0.84%2.61%1.99%5.75%4.68%4.41%3.12%7.12%2.34%1.67%

Drawdowns

0939.HK vs. 2333.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0939.HK drawdown since its inception was -69.85%, smaller than the maximum 2333.HK drawdown of -99.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0939.HK and 2333.HK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-7.99%
-98.35%
0939.HK
2333.HK

Volatility

0939.HK vs. 2333.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for China Construction Bank Corp (0939.HK) is 7.61%, while Great Wall Motor Co Ltd (2333.HK) has a volatility of 13.59%. This indicates that 0939.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2333.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
7.61%
13.59%
0939.HK
2333.HK

Financials

0939.HK vs. 2333.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Construction Bank Corp and Great Wall Motor Co Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in HKD except per share items