0939.HK vs. 0836.HK
Compare and contrast key facts about China Construction Bank Corp (0939.HK) and China Resources Power Holding (0836.HK).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: 0939.HK or 0836.HK.
Key characteristics
| 0939.HK | 0836.HK | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 21.29% | 34.91% |
| 1Y Return | 13.23% | 21.07% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 4.74% | 34.79% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 4.38% | 21.05% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 7.19% | 6.49% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.84 | 1.16 |
| Daily Std Dev | 21.24% | 28.28% |
| Max Drawdown | -69.85% | -66.06% |
| Current Drawdown | -8.06% | -19.36% |
Fundamentals
| 0939.HK | 0836.HK | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | HK$1.43T | HK$102.70B |
| EPS | HK$1.34 | HK$0.00 |
| PE Ratio | 3.97 | 9.32 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.79 | 0.54 |
| Revenue (TTM) | HK$620.10B | HK$103.33B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | HK$667.93B | HK$27.52B |
Correlation
The correlation between 0939.HK and 0836.HK is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
0939.HK vs. 0836.HK - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, 0939.HK achieves a 21.29% return, which is significantly lower than 0836.HK's 34.91% return. Over the past 10 years, 0939.HK has outperformed 0836.HK with an annualized return of 7.19%, while 0836.HK has yielded a comparatively lower 6.49% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
0939.HK vs. 0836.HK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Construction Bank Corp (0939.HK) and China Resources Power Holding (0836.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
0939.HK vs. 0836.HK - Dividend Comparison
0939.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.48%, more than 0836.HK's 5.71% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0939.HK China Construction Bank Corp | 7.48% | 9.08% | 8.71% | 7.24% | 5.94% | 5.19% | 5.34% | 4.44% | 5.41% | 7.18% | 5.93% | 5.76% |
0836.HK China Resources Power Holding | 5.71% | 7.70% | 1.60% | 2.51% | 6.86% | 3.68% | 5.81% | 6.01% | 7.10% | 5.31% | 3.75% | 2.88% |
Drawdowns
0939.HK vs. 0836.HK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 0939.HK drawdown since its inception was -69.85%, which is greater than 0836.HK's maximum drawdown of -66.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0939.HK and 0836.HK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
0939.HK vs. 0836.HK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for China Construction Bank Corp (0939.HK) is 7.61%, while China Resources Power Holding (0836.HK) has a volatility of 8.10%. This indicates that 0939.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 0836.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
0939.HK vs. 0836.HK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Construction Bank Corp and China Resources Power Holding. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities