PortfoliosLab logo
0388.HK vs. AFTY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between 0388.HK and AFTY is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

0388.HK vs. AFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hong Kong Exchange and Clearing Ltd (0388.HK) and Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

50.00%100.00%150.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
173.08%
33.86%
0388.HK
AFTY

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


0388.HK

YTD

26.16%

1M

22.97%

6M

11.43%

1Y

47.05%

5Y*

11.74%

10Y*

5.25%

AFTY

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

0388.HK vs. AFTY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0388.HK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of 0388.HK is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of 0388.HK is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of 0388.HK is 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of 0388.HK is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of 0388.HK is 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of 0388.HK is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

AFTY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AFTY is 2121
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AFTY is 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AFTY is 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AFTY is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AFTY is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AFTY is 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

0388.HK vs. AFTY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hong Kong Exchange and Clearing Ltd (0388.HK) and Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.11
0.75
0388.HK
AFTY

Dividends

0388.HK vs. AFTY - Dividend Comparison

0388.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, while AFTY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
0388.HK
Hong Kong Exchange and Clearing Ltd
2.52%2.80%3.06%2.26%2.01%1.56%2.68%2.86%1.91%2.77%2.63%2.07%
AFTY
Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF
100.00%100.00%2.23%0.00%1.84%1.48%8.63%1.85%6.62%1.19%16.76%0.00%

Drawdowns

0388.HK vs. AFTY - Drawdown Comparison


-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-27.40%
-36.46%
0388.HK
AFTY

Volatility

0388.HK vs. AFTY - Volatility Comparison

Hong Kong Exchange and Clearing Ltd (0388.HK) has a higher volatility of 18.37% compared to Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) at 0.00%. This indicates that 0388.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
18.37%
0
0388.HK
AFTY