0388.HK vs. AFTY

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Hong Kong Exchange and Clearing Ltd (0388.HK) and Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY).

AFTY is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the FTSE China A 50. It was launched on Mar 12, 2015.

Performance

0388.HK vs. AFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Hong Kong Exchange and Clearing Ltd (0388.HK) and Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0388.HK vs. AFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
0388.HK Hong Kong Exchange and Clearing Ltd	-0.20%	42.10%	13.85%	-18.41%	-24.22%	9.26%	71.64%	14.65%	-2.86%	33.92%
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	19.85%	-12.81%	-22.33%	-6.87%	33.17%	43.47%	-24.10%	46.27%

Different Trading Currencies

0388.HK is traded in HKD, while AFTY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AFTY values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

0388.HK

• 1D: 3.04%
• 1M: -1.03%
• YTD: -0.20%
• 6M: -7.97%
• 1Y: 18.45%
• 3Y*: 8.06%
• 5Y*: -0.41%
• 10Y*: 11.05%

AFTY

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

0388.HK vs. AFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0388.HK

0388.HK Risk / Return Rank: 59
0388.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
0388.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
0388.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 57
0388.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
0388.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0388.HK vs. AFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hong Kong Exchange and Clearing Ltd (0388.HK) and Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	0388.HK	AFTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.67	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.02	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.85	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.03	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	0388.HK	AFTY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between 0388.HK and AFTY is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

0388.HK vs. AFTY - Dividend Comparison

0388.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, while AFTY has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
0388.HK Hong Kong Exchange and Clearing Ltd	3.13%	2.67%	2.81%	3.06%	2.26%	2.01%	1.58%	2.68%	2.86%	1.91%	2.77%	2.63%
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.23%	2.08%	1.84%	1.48%	7.96%	1.85%	6.62%	1.19%	16.76%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	0388.HK	AFTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.34%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.05%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-60.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.25%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.06%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.12%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	0388.HK	AFTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.93%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.78%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.35%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.24%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.55%	—	—