0175.HK vs. 0939.HK
Compare and contrast key facts about Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd (0175.HK) and China Construction Bank Corp (0939.HK).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: 0175.HK or 0939.HK.
Key characteristics
| 0175.HK | 0939.HK | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 10.94% | 9.68% |
| 1Y Return | 2.58% | 7.12% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -21.35% | 1.53% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -7.94% | 0.65% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 15.84% | 6.24% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.04 | 0.23 |
| Daily Std Dev | 33.11% | 20.96% |
| Max Drawdown | -92.18% | -69.85% |
| Current Drawdown | -70.46% | -16.86% |
Fundamentals
| 0175.HK | 0939.HK | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | HK$94.50B | HK$1.27T |
| EPS | HK$0.00 | HK$1.30 |
| PE Ratio | 17.07 | 3.50 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.52 | 0.79 |
| Revenue (TTM) | HK$179.20B | HK$622.34B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | HK$20.90B | HK$667.93B |
Correlation
The correlation between 0175.HK and 0939.HK is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
0175.HK vs. 0939.HK - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, 0175.HK achieves a 10.94% return, which is significantly higher than 0939.HK's 9.68% return. Over the past 10 years, 0175.HK has outperformed 0939.HK with an annualized return of 15.84%, while 0939.HK has yielded a comparatively lower 6.24% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
0175.HK vs. 0939.HK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd (0175.HK) and China Construction Bank Corp (0939.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
0175.HK vs. 0939.HK - Dividend Comparison
0175.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than 0939.HK's 8.27% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0175.HK Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd | 2.20% | 2.44% | 1.84% | 0.94% | 0.94% | 2.30% | 2.10% | 0.44% | 0.51% | 0.61% | 1.86% | 1.04% |
0939.HK China Construction Bank Corp | 8.27% | 9.08% | 8.71% | 7.24% | 5.94% | 5.19% | 5.34% | 4.44% | 5.41% | 7.18% | 5.93% | 5.76% |
Drawdowns
0175.HK vs. 0939.HK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 0175.HK drawdown since its inception was -92.18%, which is greater than 0939.HK's maximum drawdown of -69.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0175.HK and 0939.HK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
0175.HK vs. 0939.HK - Volatility Comparison
Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd (0175.HK) has a higher volatility of 8.75% compared to China Construction Bank Corp (0939.HK) at 5.20%. This indicates that 0175.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 0939.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
0175.HK vs. 0939.HK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd and China Construction Bank Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities