PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0101.HK vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

0101.HK vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Hang Lung Ppt (0101.HK) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

0101.HK is traded in HKD, while AAPL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AAPL values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0101.HK achieves a -4.72% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's 14.00% return. Over the past 10 years, 0101.HK has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of -1.27%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 29.97% annualized return.


0101.HK

1D
0.00%
1M
-13.26%
YTD
-4.72%
6M
-9.26%
1Y
29.89%
3Y*
-8.79%
5Y*
-10.73%
10Y*
-1.27%

AAPL

1D
-1.25%
1M
6.97%
YTD
14.00%
6M
11.15%
1Y
53.56%
3Y*
20.20%
5Y*
20.39%
10Y*
29.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0101.HK vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
0101.HK
Hang Lung Ppt
-4.72%49.55%-37.18%-24.23%0.10%-18.51%25.17%19.49%-18.44%20.65%
AAPL
Apple Inc
14.00%9.26%30.03%48.99%-26.28%35.38%81.49%87.96%-5.18%49.60%

Correlation

The correlation between 0101.HK and AAPL is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2007

0.08

The correlation between 0101.HK and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Hang Lung Ppt

Apple Inc

Return for Risk

0101.HK vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0101.HK
0101.HK Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
0101.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0101.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
0101.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
0101.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
0101.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0101.HK vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hang Lung Ppt (0101.HK) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


0101.HKAAPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.43

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

3.95

-2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.95

10.17

-5.22

0101.HK vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0101.HK Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0101.HK and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


0101.HKAAPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

2.42

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.33

0.75

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.04

1.04

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.83

-0.65

Drawdowns

0101.HK vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0101.HK drawdown since its inception was -76.07%, which is greater than AAPL's maximum drawdown of -61.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0101.HK and AAPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0101.HKAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.07%

-61.10%

-14.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.12%

-13.63%

-6.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.33%

-33.34%

-21.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.43%

-33.34%

-36.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.54%

-38.57%

-30.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.15%

-2.54%

-57.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.70%

-11.72%

-19.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.04%

5.28%

+1.76%

Volatility

0101.HK vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

Hang Lung Ppt (0101.HK) has a higher volatility of 7.28% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 5.20%. This indicates that 0101.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0101.HKAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.28%

5.20%

+2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.94%

15.94%

+5.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.13%

22.32%

+6.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.24%

27.42%

+5.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.27%

28.86%

+0.41%

Dividends

0101.HK vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

0101.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.62%, more than AAPL's 0.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
0101.HK
Hang Lung Ppt
6.62%6.04%11.56%7.17%5.11%4.80%3.72%4.39%5.03%3.93%4.56%4.31%
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.34%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%

Financials

0101.HK vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hang Lung Ppt and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. 0101.HK values in HKD, AAPL values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


0101.HK and AAPL have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0101.HK and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer