PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^XSP vs. ^SPXEW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^XSP vs. ^SPXEW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in S&P 500 Mini-SPX Options Index (^XSP) and S&P 500 Equal Weighted Index (^SPXEW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^XSP vs. ^SPXEW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
^XSP
S&P 500 Mini-SPX Options Index
-3.95%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%22.15%
^SPXEW
S&P 500 Equal Weighted Index
0.50%9.34%10.90%11.56%-13.11%18.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^XSP achieves a -3.95% return, which is significantly lower than ^SPXEW's 0.50% return.


^XSP

1D
0.72%
1M
-4.45%
YTD
-3.95%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
16.73%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*

^SPXEW

1D
0.32%
1M
-5.69%
YTD
0.50%
6M
1.23%
1Y
10.97%
3Y*
9.90%
5Y*
6.06%
10Y*
9.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^XSP vs. ^SPXEW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^XSP
^XSP Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
^XSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^XSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
^XSP Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
^XSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
^XSP Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

^SPXEW
^SPXEW Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
^SPXEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^SPXEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
^SPXEW Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
^SPXEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
^SPXEW Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^XSP vs. ^SPXEW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P 500 Mini-SPX Options Index (^XSP) and S&P 500 Equal Weighted Index (^SPXEW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^XSP^SPXEWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.92

0.64

+0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.41

1.02

+0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.14

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

0.88

+0.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.61

3.88

+2.74

^XSP vs. ^SPXEW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^XSP Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is higher than the ^SPXEW Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^XSP and ^SPXEW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^XSP^SPXEWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

0.64

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.37

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.48

+0.16

Correlation

The correlation between ^XSP and ^SPXEW is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Drawdowns

^XSP vs. ^SPXEW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^XSP drawdown since its inception was -25.43%, smaller than the maximum ^SPXEW drawdown of -60.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^XSP and ^SPXEW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^XSP^SPXEWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.43%

-60.83%

+35.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.14%

-12.61%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.43%

-22.47%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.78%

-5.88%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-7.05%

+1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.86%

-0.26%

Volatility

^XSP vs. ^SPXEW - Volatility Comparison

S&P 500 Mini-SPX Options Index (^XSP) has a higher volatility of 5.37% compared to S&P 500 Equal Weighted Index (^SPXEW) at 4.39%. This indicates that ^XSP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^SPXEW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^XSP^SPXEWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

4.39%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.55%

8.87%

+0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.33%

17.19%

+1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.92%

16.26%

+0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.89%

18.43%

-1.54%