^XLHK vs. VOO

In the year-to-date period, ^XLHK achieves a 8.02% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 1.73% return. Over the past 10 years, ^XLHK has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of -3.02%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.86% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dow Jones Hong Kong Titans 30 Index (^XLHK) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ^XLHK Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^XLHK and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

The maximum ^XLHK drawdown since its inception was -68.02%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^XLHK and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Dow Jones Hong Kong Titans 30 Index (^XLHK) is 3.70%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that ^XLHK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.