PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^XCMP vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^XCMP vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NASDAQ Composite Total Return Index (^XCMP) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^XCMP achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.16% return. Over the past 10 years, ^XCMP has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 18.34%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.14% annualized return.


^XCMP

1D
1.01%
1M
-1.76%
6M
8.48%
YTD
9.53%
1Y
23.62%
3Y*
21.95%
5Y*
12.40%
10Y*
18.34%
ALL TIME*
13.27%

VOO

1D
0.71%
1M
0.26%
6M
8.58%
YTD
10.16%
1Y
21.58%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
15.14%
ALL TIME*
14.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$3.82B$3.78B$5.44B

^XCMP vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^XCMP
NASDAQ Composite Total Return Index
9.53%21.14%29.57%44.64%-32.54%22.18%44.92%36.69%-2.84%29.64%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.16%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between ^XCMP and VOO is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.93

The correlation between ^XCMP and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^XCMP vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

^XCMP
^XCMP Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
^XCMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^XCMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
^XCMP Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
^XCMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
^XCMP Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

^XCMP vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NASDAQ Composite Total Return Index (^XCMP) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


^XCMPVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.28

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

2.21

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.39

9.44

-4.05

^XCMP vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^XCMP Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^XCMP and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

^XCMP vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^XCMP drawdown since its inception was -55.07%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^XCMP and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^XCMPVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.07%

-33.99%

-21.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.96%

-8.90%

-4.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.16%

-18.69%

-5.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.83%

-24.52%

-11.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.83%

-33.99%

-1.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.27%

-1.38%

-4.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.99%

-3.67%

-4.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

2.08%

+1.80%

Volatility

^XCMP vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

NASDAQ Composite Total Return Index (^XCMP) has a higher volatility of 5.74% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.54%. This indicates that ^XCMP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^XCMPVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.74%

3.54%

+2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.70%

10.10%

+4.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.43%

12.82%

+5.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.76%

16.93%

+5.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.11%

18.01%

+4.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, ^XCMP and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

^XCMP has higher volatility (5.74%) compared to VOO (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^XCMP dropped -55.07% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^XCMP and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer