^XCMP vs. QQQ
^XCMP (NASDAQ Composite Total Return Index) is an index, while QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
^XCMP vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
^XCMP
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- 6M
- 16.05%
- YTD
- 18.38%
- 1Y
- 31.54%
- 3Y*
- 26.10%
- 5Y*
- 15.67%
- 10Y*
- 21.45%
^XCMP vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
^XCMP NASDAQ Composite Total Return Index | 0.07% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 2.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between ^XCMP and QQQ is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2026 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
^XCMP vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
^XCMP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QQQ
^XCMP vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NASDAQ Composite Total Return Index (^XCMP) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ^XCMP | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.62 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.43 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
^XCMP vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ^XCMP drawdown since its inception was -7.07%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^XCMP and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ^XCMP | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.07% | -82.97% | +75.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.93% | -2.66% | -0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.91% | -32.67% | +29.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.32% | — |
Volatility
^XCMP vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ^XCMP | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.28% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.44% | 18.47% | +3.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.44% | 22.77% | -0.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.44% | 22.43% | +0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, ^XCMP and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for ^XCMP and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer