PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^XCI vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^XCI vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARCA Computer Technology Index (^XCI) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^XCI achieves a 24.22% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 33.62% return. Over the past 10 years, ^XCI has outperformed VGT with an annualized return of 27.64%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively lower 25.97% annualized return.


^XCI

1D
0.35%
1M
14.52%
YTD
24.22%
6M
22.39%
1Y
58.78%
3Y*
36.93%
5Y*
26.65%
10Y*
27.64%

VGT

1D
1.27%
1M
19.95%
YTD
33.62%
6M
32.71%
1Y
65.14%
3Y*
34.15%
5Y*
23.05%
10Y*
25.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^XCI vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^XCI
ARCA Computer Technology Index
24.22%26.59%42.26%66.65%-32.43%41.49%43.93%49.12%-3.42%37.69%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
33.62%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between ^XCI and VGT is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.95

The correlation between ^XCI and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^XCI vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^XCI
^XCI Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
^XCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^XCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
^XCI Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
^XCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
^XCI Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^XCI vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARCA Computer Technology Index (^XCI) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^XCIVGTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.01

3.19

-0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.78

3.88

-0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.51

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

4.06

-0.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.17

13.01

-2.84

^XCI vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^XCI Sharpe Ratio is 3.01, which is comparable to the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^XCI and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^XCIVGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.01

3.19

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

0.92

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.10

1.06

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.68

-0.27

Drawdowns

^XCI vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^XCI drawdown since its inception was -77.19%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^XCI and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^XCIVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.19%

-54.63%

-22.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.85%

-16.40%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.74%

-27.23%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.04%

-35.07%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.04%

-35.07%

-1.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.26%

-7.95%

-23.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.95%

5.12%

+0.83%

Volatility

^XCI vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ARCA Computer Technology Index (^XCI) is 5.43%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 5.98%. This indicates that ^XCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^XCIVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.43%

5.98%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.08%

15.98%

-0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.63%

20.52%

-0.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.65%

25.17%

+0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.19%

24.60%

+0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, ^XCI and VGT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VGT has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to ^XCI (5.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^XCI dropped -77.19% vs VGT's -54.63%.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 3.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^XCI and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer