PortfoliosLab logo
^XCI vs. TMFC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ^XCI and TMFC is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

^XCI vs. TMFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARCA Computer Technology Index (^XCI) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

^XCI:

0.41

TMFC:

0.76

Sortino Ratio

^XCI:

0.77

TMFC:

1.19

Omega Ratio

^XCI:

1.10

TMFC:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

^XCI:

0.46

TMFC:

0.85

Martin Ratio

^XCI:

1.42

TMFC:

3.03

Ulcer Index

^XCI:

8.69%

TMFC:

5.63%

Daily Std Dev

^XCI:

30.44%

TMFC:

22.32%

Max Drawdown

^XCI:

-77.19%

TMFC:

-33.06%

Current Drawdown

^XCI:

-12.58%

TMFC:

-7.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^XCI achieves a -9.33% return, which is significantly lower than TMFC's -4.08% return.


^XCI

YTD

-9.33%

1M

9.59%

6M

-9.10%

1Y

11.92%

5Y*

22.72%

10Y*

21.10%

TMFC

YTD

-4.08%

1M

8.48%

6M

-2.93%

1Y

16.70%

5Y*

17.68%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

^XCI vs. TMFC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^XCI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^XCI is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^XCI is 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^XCI is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^XCI is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^XCI is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^XCI is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

TMFC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TMFC is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TMFC is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TMFC is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TMFC is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TMFC is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TMFC is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

^XCI vs. TMFC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARCA Computer Technology Index (^XCI) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ^XCI Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the TMFC Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^XCI and TMFC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

^XCI vs. TMFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^XCI drawdown since its inception was -77.19%, which is greater than TMFC's maximum drawdown of -33.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^XCI and TMFC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

^XCI vs. TMFC - Volatility Comparison

ARCA Computer Technology Index (^XCI) has a higher volatility of 9.84% compared to Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) at 7.78%. This indicates that ^XCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...