PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^VIX vs. ANGL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^VIX vs. ANGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CBOE Volatility Index (^VIX) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^VIX vs. ANGL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^VIX
CBOE Volatility Index
64.15%-13.83%39.36%-42.55%25.84%-24.31%65.09%-45.79%130.25%-21.37%
ANGL
VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF
-0.56%9.04%6.06%12.52%-14.26%6.84%13.20%18.06%-5.84%9.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^VIX achieves a 64.15% return, which is significantly higher than ANGL's -0.56% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ^VIX having a 6.48% annualized return and ANGL not far ahead at 6.73%.


^VIX

1D
-2.81%
1M
14.46%
YTD
64.15%
6M
50.64%
1Y
12.72%
3Y*
9.48%
5Y*
7.21%
10Y*
6.48%

ANGL

1D
0.65%
1M
-2.01%
YTD
-0.56%
6M
0.13%
1Y
6.50%
3Y*
7.37%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*
6.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^VIX vs. ANGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^VIX
^VIX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
^VIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^VIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
^VIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
^VIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
^VIX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

ANGL
ANGL Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
ANGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANGL Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
ANGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANGL Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^VIX vs. ANGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CBOE Volatility Index (^VIX) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^VIXANGLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.09

1.00

-0.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.25

1.40

-0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.24

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.58

1.26

-1.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.75

5.20

-5.95

^VIX vs. ANGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^VIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the ANGL Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^VIX and ANGL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^VIXANGLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

1.00

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.44

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

0.73

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.73

-0.72

Correlation

The correlation between ^VIX and ANGL is -0.43. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Drawdowns

^VIX vs. ANGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^VIX drawdown since its inception was -88.70%, which is greater than ANGL's maximum drawdown of -29.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^VIX and ANGL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^VIXANGLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.70%

-29.31%

-59.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-74.26%

-5.28%

-68.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.26%

-19.25%

-55.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.66%

-29.31%

-56.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.32%

-2.38%

-67.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.04%

-3.33%

-60.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

46.08%

1.28%

+44.80%

Volatility

^VIX vs. ANGL - Volatility Comparison

CBOE Volatility Index (^VIX) has a higher volatility of 48.46% compared to VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) at 2.64%. This indicates that ^VIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^VIXANGLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

48.46%

2.64%

+45.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

93.57%

3.40%

+90.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

139.41%

6.54%

+132.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

125.25%

7.61%

+117.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

135.98%

9.30%

+126.68%