PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^TNX vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^TNX vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^TNX vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^TNX
Treasury Yield 10 Years
3.75%-8.97%18.29%-0.34%156.55%64.89%-52.21%-28.56%11.68%-1.68%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
-3.95%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^TNX achieves a 3.75% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -3.95% return. Over the past 10 years, ^TNX has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 9.20%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.24% annualized return.


^TNX

1D
0.19%
1M
6.69%
YTD
3.75%
6M
5.19%
1Y
3.92%
3Y*
7.32%
5Y*
20.80%
10Y*
9.20%

^GSPC

1D
0.72%
1M
-4.45%
YTD
-3.95%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
16.73%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^TNX vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^TNX
^TNX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
^TNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^TNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
^TNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
^TNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
^TNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^TNX vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^TNX^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.22

0.92

-0.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.45

1.41

-0.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.21

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.12

1.41

-1.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.21

6.61

-6.41

^TNX vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^TNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^TNX and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^TNX^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

0.92

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.61

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

0.68

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

0.46

-0.48

Correlation

The correlation between ^TNX and ^GSPC is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Drawdowns

^TNX vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^TNX drawdown since its inception was -93.78%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^TNX and ^GSPC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^TNX^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.78%

-56.78%

-37.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.99%

-12.14%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.74%

-25.43%

-6.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.57%

-33.92%

-50.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.17%

-5.78%

-40.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.38%

-10.75%

-40.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.39%

2.60%

+5.79%

Volatility

^TNX vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) has a higher volatility of 5.89% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 5.37%. This indicates that ^TNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^TNX^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.89%

5.37%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.58%

9.55%

+1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.89%

18.33%

-0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.96%

16.90%

+16.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.18%

18.05%

+30.13%