PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^SPXEW vs. PFGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^SPXEW vs. PFGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in S&P 500 Equal Weighted Index (^SPXEW) and Performance Food Group Company (PFGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^SPXEW vs. PFGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^SPXEW
S&P 500 Equal Weighted Index
0.50%9.34%10.90%11.56%-13.11%27.48%10.47%26.57%-9.43%16.68%
PFGC
Performance Food Group Company
-6.32%6.35%22.27%18.43%27.24%-3.61%-7.52%59.53%-2.51%37.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^SPXEW achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly higher than PFGC's -6.32% return. Over the past 10 years, ^SPXEW has underperformed PFGC with an annualized return of 9.30%, while PFGC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.61% annualized return.


^SPXEW

1D
0.32%
1M
-5.69%
YTD
0.50%
6M
1.23%
1Y
10.97%
3Y*
9.90%
5Y*
6.06%
10Y*
9.30%

PFGC

1D
-1.66%
1M
-12.09%
YTD
-6.32%
6M
-17.69%
1Y
6.03%
3Y*
11.76%
5Y*
7.91%
10Y*
13.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^SPXEW vs. PFGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^SPXEW
^SPXEW Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
^SPXEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^SPXEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
^SPXEW Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
^SPXEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
^SPXEW Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

PFGC
PFGC Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PFGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFGC Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
PFGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFGC Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^SPXEW vs. PFGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P 500 Equal Weighted Index (^SPXEW) and Performance Food Group Company (PFGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^SPXEWPFGCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

0.21

+0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.02

0.53

+0.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.06

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

0.28

+0.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.88

0.69

+3.19

^SPXEW vs. PFGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^SPXEW Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the PFGC Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^SPXEW and PFGC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^SPXEWPFGCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

0.21

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.24

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.30

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.33

+0.15

Correlation

The correlation between ^SPXEW and PFGC is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Drawdowns

^SPXEW vs. PFGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^SPXEW drawdown since its inception was -60.83%, smaller than the maximum PFGC drawdown of -78.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^SPXEW and PFGC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^SPXEWPFGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.83%

-78.85%

+18.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.61%

-25.47%

+12.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.47%

-33.78%

+11.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.21%

-78.85%

+39.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.88%

-22.52%

+16.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.05%

-11.36%

+4.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

10.40%

-7.54%

Volatility

^SPXEW vs. PFGC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for S&P 500 Equal Weighted Index (^SPXEW) is 4.39%, while Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) has a volatility of 8.00%. This indicates that ^SPXEW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^SPXEWPFGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

8.00%

-3.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

21.31%

-12.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.19%

29.53%

-12.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

32.52%

-16.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.43%

46.01%

-27.58%