PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^SPXEW vs. PFGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^SPXEW vs. PFGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in S&P 500 Equal Weighted Index (^SPXEW) and Performance Food Group Company (PFGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^SPXEW achieves a 8.90% return, which is significantly higher than PFGC's 7.36% return. Over the past 10 years, ^SPXEW has underperformed PFGC with an annualized return of 9.93%, while PFGC has yielded a comparatively higher 14.39% annualized return.


^SPXEW

1D
-0.42%
1M
3.56%
YTD
8.90%
6M
9.21%
1Y
17.41%
3Y*
13.23%
5Y*
6.49%
10Y*
9.93%

PFGC

1D
0.34%
1M
11.04%
YTD
7.36%
6M
4.25%
1Y
8.63%
3Y*
19.10%
5Y*
14.39%
10Y*
14.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^SPXEW vs. PFGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^SPXEW
S&P 500 Equal Weighted Index
8.90%9.34%10.90%11.56%-13.11%27.48%10.47%26.57%-9.43%16.68%
PFGC
Performance Food Group Company
7.36%6.35%22.27%18.43%27.24%-3.61%-7.52%59.53%-2.51%37.92%

Correlation

The correlation between ^SPXEW and PFGC is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2015

0.52

The correlation between ^SPXEW and PFGC shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^SPXEW vs. PFGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^SPXEW
^SPXEW Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
^SPXEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^SPXEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
^SPXEW Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
^SPXEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
^SPXEW Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

PFGC
PFGC Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PFGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFGC Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
PFGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFGC Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^SPXEW vs. PFGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P 500 Equal Weighted Index (^SPXEW) and Performance Food Group Company (PFGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^SPXEWPFGCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.08

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

0.34

+1.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.16

0.71

+7.45

^SPXEW vs. PFGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^SPXEW Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the PFGC Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^SPXEW and PFGC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^SPXEWPFGCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

0.31

+1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.45

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.31

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.36

+0.13

Drawdowns

^SPXEW vs. PFGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^SPXEW drawdown since its inception was -60.83%, smaller than the maximum PFGC drawdown of -78.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^SPXEW and PFGC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^SPXEWPFGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.83%

-78.85%

+18.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.03%

-25.47%

+17.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.31%

-25.47%

+7.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.47%

-32.34%

+9.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.21%

-78.85%

+39.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-11.20%

+10.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.02%

-11.43%

+4.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

12.17%

-10.03%

Volatility

^SPXEW vs. PFGC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for S&P 500 Equal Weighted Index (^SPXEW) is 2.61%, while Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) has a volatility of 8.05%. This indicates that ^SPXEW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^SPXEWPFGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.61%

8.05%

-5.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.35%

23.14%

-14.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.63%

28.07%

-16.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.24%

32.35%

-16.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.43%

45.99%

-27.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


^SPXEW and PFGC have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFGC has higher volatility (8.05%) compared to ^SPXEW (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^SPXEW dropped -60.83% vs PFGC's -78.85%.

^SPXEW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^SPXEW and PFGC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer