PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^SP600 vs. VOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^SP600 vs. VOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in S&P 600 (^SP600) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^SP600 achieves a 20.10% return, which is significantly higher than VOT's 7.66% return. Over the past 10 years, ^SP600 has underperformed VOT with an annualized return of 9.06%, while VOT has yielded a comparatively higher 11.79% annualized return.


^SP600

1D
-0.39%
1M
1.04%
6M
14.10%
YTD
20.10%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
12.54%
5Y*
5.90%
10Y*
9.06%

VOT

1D
-0.91%
1M
0.93%
6M
4.90%
YTD
7.66%
1Y
6.42%
3Y*
13.21%
5Y*
5.72%
10Y*
11.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^SP600 vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^SP600
S&P 600
20.10%4.23%6.82%13.89%-17.42%25.27%9.57%20.86%-9.75%11.73%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
7.66%10.72%16.38%23.10%-28.87%20.50%34.50%33.76%-5.56%21.80%

Correlation

The correlation between ^SP600 and VOT is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2006

0.84

The correlation between ^SP600 and VOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^SP600 vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^SP600
^SP600 Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
^SP600 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^SP600 Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
^SP600 Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
^SP600 Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
^SP600 Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

VOT
VOT Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^SP600 vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P 600 (^SP600) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


^SP600VOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.08

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

0.40

+2.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.58

1.20

+9.38

^SP600 vs. VOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^SP600 Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the VOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^SP600 and VOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

^SP600 vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^SP600 drawdown since its inception was -59.17%, roughly equal to the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^SP600 and VOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^SP600VOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.17%

-60.16%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-15.96%

+7.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.39%

-21.77%

-6.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.39%

-37.19%

+8.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.77%

-37.19%

-8.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.30%

-2.21%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.25%

-9.92%

+0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

5.36%

-2.70%

Volatility

^SP600 vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for S&P 600 (^SP600) is 4.60%, while Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) has a volatility of 6.09%. This indicates that ^SP600 experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^SP600VOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.60%

6.09%

-1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.05%

13.86%

-1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.61%

17.08%

+0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.41%

21.57%

-0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.14%

21.01%

+2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


^SP600 and VOT have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOT has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to ^SP600 (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^SP600 dropped -59.17% vs VOT's -60.16%.

^SP600 currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^SP600 and VOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer