PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^NYA vs. XLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^NYA vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYSE Composite (^NYA) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^NYA achieves a 6.63% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 28.25% return. Over the past 10 years, ^NYA has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 8.71%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.48% annualized return.


^NYA

1D
-0.56%
1M
1.02%
YTD
6.63%
6M
5.92%
1Y
17.27%
3Y*
14.90%
5Y*
7.22%
10Y*
8.71%

XLK

1D
-4.14%
1M
2.23%
YTD
28.25%
6M
26.51%
1Y
52.47%
3Y*
30.61%
5Y*
21.34%
10Y*
25.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^NYA vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^NYA
NYSE Composite
6.63%15.22%13.32%10.99%-11.53%18.17%4.40%22.32%-11.20%15.84%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
28.25%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%49.86%-1.68%34.26%

Correlation

The correlation between ^NYA and XLK is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between ^NYA and XLK has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^NYA vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^NYA
^NYA Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
^NYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^NYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
^NYA Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
^NYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
^NYA Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^NYA vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYSE Composite (^NYA) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


^NYAXLKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.38

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

3.31

-1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.76

10.56

-2.80

^NYA vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^NYA Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^NYA and XLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

^NYA vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^NYA drawdown since its inception was -59.01%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^NYA and XLK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^NYAXLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.01%

-82.05%

+23.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.26%

-15.92%

+7.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.21%

-25.66%

+10.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.37%

-33.56%

+11.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.11%

-33.56%

-4.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-6.96%

+5.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.85%

-34.90%

+25.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

4.98%

-2.75%

Volatility

^NYA vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NYSE Composite (^NYA) is 3.43%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 12.51%. This indicates that ^NYA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^NYAXLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

12.51%

-9.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.89%

19.70%

-10.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.32%

23.48%

-12.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.88%

25.37%

-10.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.85%

24.71%

-7.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


^NYA and XLK have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLK has higher volatility (12.51%) compared to ^NYA (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^NYA dropped -59.01% vs XLK's -82.05%.

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^NYA and XLK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer