^IXIC vs. VOO
^IXIC (NASDAQ Composite) is an index, while VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, ^IXIC returned 18.71%/yr vs 15.77%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
^IXIC vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ^IXIC achieves a 12.58% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, ^IXIC has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 18.71%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.77% annualized return.
^IXIC
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- 12.58%
- 6M
- 11.69%
- 1Y
- 34.55%
- 3Y*
- 24.71%
- 5Y*
- 12.89%
- 10Y*
- 18.71%
VOO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 26.77%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
^IXIC vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
^IXIC NASDAQ Composite | 12.58% | 20.36% | 28.64% | 43.42% | -33.10% | 21.39% | 43.64% | 35.23% | -3.88% | 28.24% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.75% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between ^IXIC and VOO is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.93 |
The correlation between ^IXIC and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
^IXIC vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
^IXIC
VOO
^IXIC vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ^IXIC | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.39 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 3.02 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.90 | 13.58 | -3.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
^IXIC vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ^IXIC drawdown since its inception was -77.93%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^IXIC and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ^IXIC | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.93% | -33.99% | -43.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.21% | -8.90% | -4.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.32% | -18.69% | -5.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.40% | -24.52% | -11.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.40% | -33.99% | -2.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.42% | -1.74% | -1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.38% | -3.68% | -17.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.50% | 1.98% | +1.52% |
Volatility
^IXIC vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) has a higher volatility of 7.34% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.60%. This indicates that ^IXIC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ^IXIC | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.34% | 4.60% | +2.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.72% | 9.73% | +3.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.47% | 12.39% | +5.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.63% | 16.90% | +5.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.11% | 18.05% | +4.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, ^IXIC and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
^IXIC has higher volatility (7.34%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^IXIC dropped -77.93% vs VOO's -33.99%.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ^IXIC and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer