PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^IXIC vs. SWKS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^IXIC vs. SWKS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) and Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^IXIC vs. SWKS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^IXIC
NASDAQ Composite
-7.11%20.36%28.64%43.42%-33.10%21.39%43.64%35.23%-3.88%28.24%
SWKS
Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
-14.53%-25.49%-18.86%26.55%-39.95%2.73%28.36%84.10%-28.30%28.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^IXIC achieves a -7.11% return, which is significantly higher than SWKS's -14.53% return. Over the past 10 years, ^IXIC has outperformed SWKS with an annualized return of 15.95%, while SWKS has yielded a comparatively lower -1.61% annualized return.


^IXIC

1D
3.83%
1M
-4.75%
YTD
-7.11%
6M
-4.72%
1Y
24.81%
3Y*
20.89%
5Y*
9.88%
10Y*
15.95%

SWKS

1D
2.00%
1M
-10.12%
YTD
-14.53%
6M
-28.80%
1Y
-13.53%
3Y*
-20.51%
5Y*
-20.00%
10Y*
-1.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^IXIC vs. SWKS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^IXIC
^IXIC Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
^IXIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^IXIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
^IXIC Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
^IXIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
^IXIC Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

SWKS
SWKS Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
SWKS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWKS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWKS Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
SWKS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWKS Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^IXIC vs. SWKS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) and Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^IXICSWKSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.07

-0.30

+1.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.66

-0.15

+1.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

0.98

+0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

-0.36

+2.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.71

-0.75

+7.46

^IXIC vs. SWKS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^IXIC Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the SWKS Sharpe Ratio of -0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^IXIC and SWKS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^IXICSWKSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

-0.30

+1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

-0.51

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

-0.04

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.10

+0.41

Correlation

The correlation between ^IXIC and SWKS is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Drawdowns

^IXIC vs. SWKS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^IXIC drawdown since its inception was -77.93%, smaller than the maximum SWKS drawdown of -96.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^IXIC and SWKS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^IXICSWKSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.93%

-96.12%

+18.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.26%

-35.24%

+21.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.40%

-72.88%

+36.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.40%

-72.88%

+36.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.88%

-69.19%

+59.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.46%

-55.72%

+34.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.67%

17.20%

-13.53%

Volatility

^IXIC vs. SWKS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) is 6.98%, while Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) has a volatility of 8.42%. This indicates that ^IXIC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWKS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^IXICSWKSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.98%

8.42%

-1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.04%

27.10%

-14.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.31%

45.15%

-21.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.45%

39.14%

-16.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.97%

39.32%

-17.35%