^IMXL vs. SCHG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Dow Jones Islamic Market Titans 100 Index (^IMXL) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).

SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.

Performance

^IMXL vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dow Jones Islamic Market Titans 100 Index (^IMXL) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

^IMXL vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
^IMXL Dow Jones Islamic Market Titans 100 Index	-4.94%	20.39%	26.01%	33.51%	-25.49%	24.93%	26.81%	31.38%	-5.65%	23.76%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	-9.73%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	28.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^IMXL achieves a -4.94% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -9.73% return. Over the past 10 years, ^IMXL has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 13.64%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.95% annualized return.

^IMXL

• 1D: 1.49%
• 1M: -5.10%
• YTD: -4.94%
• 6M: -0.91%
• 1Y: 22.59%
• 3Y*: 19.60%
• 5Y*: 11.54%
• 10Y*: 13.64%

SCHG

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: -4.46%
• YTD: -9.73%
• 6M: -8.15%
• 1Y: 17.00%
• 3Y*: 22.30%
• 5Y*: 12.76%
• 10Y*: 16.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

^IMXL vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^IMXL

^IMXL Risk / Return Rank: 67
^IMXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
^IMXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
^IMXL Omega Ratio Rank: 82
^IMXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
^IMXL Martin Ratio Rank: 53

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 41
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 42
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^IMXL vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dow Jones Islamic Market Titans 100 Index (^IMXL) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	^IMXL	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	0.76	+0.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	1.24	+0.45
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.17	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	1.09	+0.02
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.60	3.71	+0.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

^IMXL vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^IMXL Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^IMXL and SCHG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	^IMXL	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.13	0.76	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.57	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80	0.79	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.79	-0.38

Correlation

The correlation between ^IMXL and SCHG is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Drawdowns

^IMXL vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^IMXL drawdown since its inception was -48.36%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^IMXL and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	^IMXL	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.36%	-34.59%	-13.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.76%	-16.41%	+4.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.52%	-34.59%	+4.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.52%	-34.59%	+4.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.73%	-12.51%	+4.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.87%	-5.22%	-5.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.74%	4.84%	-2.10%

Volatility

^IMXL vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dow Jones Islamic Market Titans 100 Index (^IMXL) is 5.54%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 6.77%. This indicates that ^IMXL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	^IMXL	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.54%	6.77%	-1.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.96%	12.54%	-3.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.13%	22.45%	-6.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.92%	22.31%	-5.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.64%	21.51%	-4.87%