PortfoliosLab logo
^GSPC vs. IWM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ^GSPC and IWM is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

^GSPC vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in S&P 500 (^GSPC) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
308.65%
497.84%
^GSPC
IWM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

^GSPC:

0.51

IWM:

-0.05

Sortino Ratio

^GSPC:

0.84

IWM:

0.11

Omega Ratio

^GSPC:

1.12

IWM:

1.01

Calmar Ratio

^GSPC:

0.52

IWM:

-0.04

Martin Ratio

^GSPC:

2.02

IWM:

-0.12

Ulcer Index

^GSPC:

4.87%

IWM:

9.27%

Daily Std Dev

^GSPC:

19.36%

IWM:

23.98%

Max Drawdown

^GSPC:

-56.78%

IWM:

-59.05%

Current Drawdown

^GSPC:

-8.35%

IWM:

-18.13%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^GSPC achieves a -4.26% return, which is significantly higher than IWM's -10.45% return. Over the past 10 years, ^GSPC has outperformed IWM with an annualized return of 10.31%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively lower 6.29% annualized return.


^GSPC

YTD

-4.26%

1M

11.24%

6M

-5.02%

1Y

8.55%

5Y*

14.02%

10Y*

10.31%

IWM

YTD

-10.45%

1M

9.95%

6M

-16.34%

1Y

-2.58%

5Y*

9.73%

10Y*

6.29%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

^GSPC vs. IWM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

IWM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IWM is 1717
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IWM is 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IWM is 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IWM is 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IWM is 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IWM is 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

^GSPC vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P 500 (^GSPC) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is higher than the IWM Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^GSPC and IWM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.44
-0.11
^GSPC
IWM

Drawdowns

^GSPC vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^GSPC drawdown since its inception was -56.78%, roughly equal to the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^GSPC and IWM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-8.35%
-18.13%
^GSPC
IWM

Volatility

^GSPC vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

S&P 500 (^GSPC) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) have volatilities of 11.43% and 11.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
11.43%
11.12%
^GSPC
IWM