PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^FVX vs. ES=F
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^FVX vs. ES=F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Treasury Yield 5 Years (^FVX) and S&P 500 E-Mini Futures (ES=F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^FVX vs. ES=F - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^FVX
Treasury Yield 5 Years
6.07%-15.02%14.06%-4.00%216.71%249.86%-78.68%-32.55%13.78%14.06%
ES=F
S&P 500 E-Mini Futures
-3.90%16.12%23.15%24.84%-18.86%26.94%16.02%28.97%-6.38%19.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^FVX achieves a 6.07% return, which is significantly higher than ES=F's -3.90% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ^FVX having a 12.42% annualized return and ES=F not far behind at 12.40%.


^FVX

1D
-0.18%
1M
8.73%
YTD
6.07%
6M
7.49%
1Y
-0.08%
3Y*
3.81%
5Y*
34.20%
10Y*
12.42%

ES=F

1D
0.09%
1M
-2.94%
YTD
-3.90%
6M
-2.11%
1Y
15.96%
3Y*
16.83%
5Y*
10.24%
10Y*
12.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^FVX vs. ES=F — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^FVX
^FVX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
^FVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^FVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
^FVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
^FVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
^FVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

ES=F
ES=F Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
ES=F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ES=F Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
ES=F Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
ES=F Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
ES=F Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^FVX vs. ES=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Treasury Yield 5 Years (^FVX) and S&P 500 E-Mini Futures (ES=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^FVXES=FDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.00

0.83

-0.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.15

1.28

-1.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.20

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.06

1.36

-1.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.11

6.06

-5.96

^FVX vs. ES=F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^FVX Sharpe Ratio is -0.00, which is lower than the ES=F Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^FVX and ES=F, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^FVXES=FDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

0.83

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.60

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

0.67

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

0.36

-0.37

Correlation

The correlation between ^FVX and ES=F is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Drawdowns

^FVX vs. ES=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^FVX drawdown since its inception was -97.53%, which is greater than ES=F's maximum drawdown of -57.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^FVX and ES=F.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^FVXES=FDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.53%

-57.11%

-40.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.62%

-8.95%

-6.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.36%

-25.02%

-6.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.69%

-34.45%

-59.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.00%

-5.59%

-44.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.58%

-12.56%

-44.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.26%

2.01%

+7.25%

Volatility

^FVX vs. ES=F - Volatility Comparison

Treasury Yield 5 Years (^FVX) has a higher volatility of 7.45% compared to S&P 500 E-Mini Futures (ES=F) at 5.00%. This indicates that ^FVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ES=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^FVXES=FDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.45%

5.00%

+2.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.85%

8.75%

+4.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.34%

17.09%

+4.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.92%

16.48%

+23.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.94%

17.61%

+41.33%