PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^DWMI vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^DWMI vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dow Jones U.S. Micro-Cap Total Stock Market Index (^DWMI) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^DWMI achieves a 5.19% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 12.29% return.


^DWMI

1D
-0.46%
1M
-7.46%
6M
1.84%
YTD
5.19%
1Y
22.02%
3Y*
10.21%
5Y*
-1.32%
10Y*
6.25%
ALL TIME*
4.53%

QQQM

1D
0.69%
1M
-3.45%
6M
10.92%
YTD
12.29%
1Y
24.86%
3Y*
22.37%
5Y*
14.31%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$962.22M$908.74M$1.19B

^DWMI vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
^DWMI
Dow Jones U.S. Micro-Cap Total Stock Market Index
5.19%12.68%13.53%7.36%-29.88%9.37%21.19%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
12.29%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.64%

Correlation

The correlation between ^DWMI and QQQM is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020

0.63

The correlation between ^DWMI and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^DWMI vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

^DWMI
^DWMI Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
^DWMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^DWMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
^DWMI Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
^DWMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
^DWMI Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

^DWMI vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dow Jones U.S. Micro-Cap Total Stock Market Index (^DWMI) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


^DWMIQQQMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.21

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

1.88

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.83

6.01

-2.18

^DWMI vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^DWMI Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^DWMI and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

^DWMI vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^DWMI drawdown since its inception was -66.10%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^DWMI and QQQM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^DWMIQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.10%

-35.04%

-31.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.56%

-11.96%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.06%

-22.70%

-4.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.65%

-35.04%

-12.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.33%

-7.69%

-11.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.94%

-8.15%

-11.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.10%

3.74%

+1.36%

Volatility

^DWMI vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dow Jones U.S. Micro-Cap Total Stock Market Index (^DWMI) is 6.41%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that ^DWMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^DWMIQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.41%

6.83%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.80%

15.91%

+1.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.05%

19.24%

+4.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.00%

22.74%

+1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.56%

22.32%

+2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


^DWMI and QQQM have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQM has higher volatility (6.83%) compared to ^DWMI (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^DWMI dropped -66.10% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^DWMI and QQQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer