PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^DWGROT vs. ^IXIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^DWGROT vs. ^IXIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dow Jones U.S. Growth Total Stock Market Index (^DWGROT) and NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^DWGROT vs. ^IXIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
^DWGROT
Dow Jones U.S. Growth Total Stock Market Index
-10.28%17.83%33.64%47.46%-31.24%25.81%38.07%10.38%
^IXIC
NASDAQ Composite
-5.86%20.36%28.64%43.42%-33.10%21.39%43.64%11.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^DWGROT achieves a -10.28% return, which is significantly lower than ^IXIC's -5.86% return.


^DWGROT

1D
3.83%
1M
-5.47%
YTD
-10.28%
6M
-8.62%
1Y
16.79%
3Y*
21.34%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*

^IXIC

1D
0.18%
1M
-2.83%
YTD
-5.86%
6M
-4.22%
1Y
24.31%
3Y*
21.53%
5Y*
10.17%
10Y*
16.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^DWGROT vs. ^IXIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^DWGROT
^DWGROT Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
^DWGROT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^DWGROT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
^DWGROT Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
^DWGROT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
^DWGROT Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

^IXIC
^IXIC Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
^IXIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^IXIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
^IXIC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
^IXIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
^IXIC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^DWGROT vs. ^IXIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dow Jones U.S. Growth Total Stock Market Index (^DWGROT) and NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^DWGROT^IXICDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.78

1.05

-0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.28

1.63

-0.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.23

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

1.91

-0.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.82

6.77

-2.94

^DWGROT vs. ^IXIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^DWGROT Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is comparable to the ^IXIC Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^DWGROT and ^IXIC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^DWGROT^IXICDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

1.05

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.46

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.51

+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between ^DWGROT and ^IXIC is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Drawdowns

^DWGROT vs. ^IXIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^DWGROT drawdown since its inception was -34.14%, smaller than the maximum ^IXIC drawdown of -77.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^DWGROT and ^IXIC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^DWGROT^IXICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.14%

-77.93%

+43.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.18%

-13.21%

-2.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.14%

-36.40%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.97%

-8.68%

-4.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.29%

-21.46%

+13.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.63%

3.75%

+0.88%

Volatility

^DWGROT vs. ^IXIC - Volatility Comparison

Dow Jones U.S. Growth Total Stock Market Index (^DWGROT) and NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) have volatilities of 6.88% and 6.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^DWGROT^IXICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.88%

6.91%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.69%

13.09%

-0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.84%

23.32%

-0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.34%

22.43%

-0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.62%

21.96%

+2.66%