PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^DWCF vs. DIA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^DWCF vs. DIA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dow Jones U.S. Total Stock Market Index (^DWCF) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^DWCF achieves a 11.53% return, which is significantly higher than DIA's 6.26% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ^DWCF having a 13.26% annualized return and DIA not far behind at 13.21%.


^DWCF

1D
0.24%
1M
5.68%
YTD
11.53%
6M
11.31%
1Y
27.58%
3Y*
20.78%
5Y*
11.49%
10Y*
13.26%

DIA

1D
-1.13%
1M
3.88%
YTD
6.26%
6M
6.75%
1Y
21.13%
3Y*
16.45%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
13.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^DWCF vs. DIA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^DWCF
Dow Jones U.S. Total Stock Market Index
11.53%15.59%22.21%24.06%-20.80%24.01%18.72%28.42%-7.04%18.89%
DIA
State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
6.26%14.71%14.82%16.02%-7.02%20.83%9.59%24.70%-3.74%28.08%

Correlation

The correlation between ^DWCF and DIA is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 1998

0.90

The correlation between ^DWCF and DIA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^DWCF vs. DIA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^DWCF
^DWCF Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
^DWCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^DWCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
^DWCF Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
^DWCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
^DWCF Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

DIA
DIA Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIA Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
DIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIA Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^DWCF vs. DIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dow Jones U.S. Total Stock Market Index (^DWCF) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^DWCFDIADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.33

1.76

+0.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.18

2.57

+0.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.31

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

2.18

+0.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.22

8.42

+5.81

^DWCF vs. DIA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^DWCF Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the DIA Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^DWCF and DIA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^DWCFDIADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

1.76

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.66

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.76

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.49

+0.01

Drawdowns

^DWCF vs. DIA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^DWCF drawdown since its inception was -56.81%, which is greater than DIA's maximum drawdown of -51.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^DWCF and DIA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^DWCFDIADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.81%

-51.87%

-4.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.12%

-9.76%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.59%

-15.95%

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.31%

-20.76%

-5.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.14%

-36.70%

+1.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.13%

+1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.30%

-7.14%

-3.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

2.52%

-0.51%

Volatility

^DWCF vs. DIA - Volatility Comparison

Dow Jones U.S. Total Stock Market Index (^DWCF) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) have volatilities of 2.98% and 2.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^DWCFDIADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.98%

2.97%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.23%

9.28%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.26%

12.10%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.40%

14.78%

+2.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.46%

17.53%

+0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


^DWCF and DIA have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

^DWCF has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to DIA (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^DWCF dropped -56.81% vs DIA's -51.87%.

^DWCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^DWCF and DIA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer