PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^DJUSST vs. NUE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^DJUSST vs. NUE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dow Jones U.S. Iron & Steel Index (^DJUSST) and Nucor Corporation (NUE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^DJUSST vs. NUE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^DJUSST
Dow Jones U.S. Iron & Steel Index
1.83%41.01%-23.32%32.54%17.42%80.64%-7.86%15.40%-24.56%11.22%
NUE
Nucor Corporation
6.87%42.03%-31.95%33.75%17.39%118.45%-1.77%11.84%-16.36%9.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^DJUSST achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly lower than NUE's 6.87% return. Over the past 10 years, ^DJUSST has underperformed NUE with an annualized return of 13.79%, while NUE has yielded a comparatively higher 16.40% annualized return.


^DJUSST

1D
1.84%
1M
-7.88%
YTD
1.83%
6M
17.66%
1Y
37.47%
3Y*
7.98%
5Y*
16.71%
10Y*
13.79%

NUE

1D
2.73%
1M
-3.47%
YTD
6.87%
6M
29.19%
1Y
47.38%
3Y*
5.52%
5Y*
18.60%
10Y*
16.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^DJUSST vs. NUE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^DJUSST
^DJUSST Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
^DJUSST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^DJUSST Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
^DJUSST Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
^DJUSST Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
^DJUSST Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

NUE
NUE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
NUE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
NUE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^DJUSST vs. NUE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dow Jones U.S. Iron & Steel Index (^DJUSST) and Nucor Corporation (NUE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^DJUSSTNUEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.18

1.35

-0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.75

1.95

-0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.25

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

2.53

-0.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.71

6.72

-1.02

^DJUSST vs. NUE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^DJUSST Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the NUE Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^DJUSST and NUE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^DJUSSTNUEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

1.35

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.49

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.46

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.39

-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between ^DJUSST and NUE is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Drawdowns

^DJUSST vs. NUE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^DJUSST drawdown since its inception was -81.48%, which is greater than NUE's maximum drawdown of -68.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^DJUSST and NUE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^DJUSSTNUEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.48%

-68.34%

-13.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.17%

-18.43%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.57%

-47.79%

+9.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.00%

-57.21%

-3.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.24%

-10.80%

-3.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.35%

-21.22%

-16.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.52%

6.92%

-0.40%

Volatility

^DJUSST vs. NUE - Volatility Comparison

Dow Jones U.S. Iron & Steel Index (^DJUSST) has a higher volatility of 8.29% compared to Nucor Corporation (NUE) at 7.67%. This indicates that ^DJUSST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^DJUSSTNUEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.29%

7.67%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.39%

20.67%

-0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.95%

35.34%

-3.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.83%

38.14%

-4.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.07%

35.86%

-1.79%