PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^DJUSST vs. NUE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^DJUSST vs. NUE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dow Jones U.S. Iron & Steel Index (^DJUSST) and Nucor Corporation (NUE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^DJUSST achieves a 35.67% return, which is significantly lower than NUE's 47.41% return. Over the past 10 years, ^DJUSST has underperformed NUE with an annualized return of 17.13%, while NUE has yielded a comparatively higher 20.12% annualized return.


^DJUSST

1D
-2.47%
1M
3.15%
YTD
35.67%
6M
32.74%
1Y
70.81%
3Y*
20.29%
5Y*
20.12%
10Y*
17.13%

NUE

1D
-2.16%
1M
3.29%
YTD
47.41%
6M
47.39%
1Y
93.08%
3Y*
17.63%
5Y*
21.45%
10Y*
20.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^DJUSST vs. NUE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^DJUSST
Dow Jones U.S. Iron & Steel Index
35.67%41.01%-23.32%32.54%17.42%80.64%-7.86%15.40%-24.56%11.22%
NUE
Nucor Corporation
47.41%42.03%-31.95%33.75%17.39%118.45%-1.77%11.84%-16.36%9.60%

Correlation

The correlation between ^DJUSST and NUE is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2000

0.92

The correlation between ^DJUSST and NUE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^DJUSST vs. NUE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^DJUSST
^DJUSST Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
^DJUSST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^DJUSST Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
^DJUSST Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
^DJUSST Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
^DJUSST Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

NUE
NUE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
NUE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUE Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
NUE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^DJUSST vs. NUE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dow Jones U.S. Iron & Steel Index (^DJUSST) and Nucor Corporation (NUE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


^DJUSSTNUEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.47

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

5.08

-1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.90

15.07

-4.17

^DJUSST vs. NUE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^DJUSST Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the NUE Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^DJUSST and NUE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

^DJUSST vs. NUE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^DJUSST drawdown since its inception was -81.48%, which is greater than NUE's maximum drawdown of -68.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^DJUSST and NUE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^DJUSSTNUEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.48%

-68.34%

-13.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.17%

-18.43%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.57%

-47.79%

+9.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.57%

-47.79%

+9.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.00%

-57.21%

-3.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.51%

-10.03%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.05%

-21.12%

-15.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.51%

6.20%

+0.31%

Volatility

^DJUSST vs. NUE - Volatility Comparison

Dow Jones U.S. Iron & Steel Index (^DJUSST) and Nucor Corporation (NUE) have volatilities of 10.72% and 10.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^DJUSSTNUEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.72%

10.21%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.40%

21.10%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.67%

29.46%

-0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.65%

37.70%

-4.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.07%

35.98%

-1.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, ^DJUSST and NUE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

^DJUSST has higher volatility (10.72%) compared to NUE (10.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^DJUSST dropped -81.48% vs NUE's -68.34%.

NUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^DJUSST and NUE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer